Velocity Reviews > Setting "all ones"

# Setting "all ones"

John Devereux
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005

I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
variable (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).

E.g. assume "a" is unsigned, but could be char, short, int or long.

a = -1;

or

a = ~0;

Would these always work? (I only care about machines with 2's
complement arithmetic).

Thanks,

--

John Devereux

pete
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005
John Devereux wrote:
>
> I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
> ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
> variable (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).
>
> E.g. assume "a" is unsigned, but could be char, short, int or long.
>
> a = -1;

Yes, always

>
> or
>
> a = ~0;

Should be ~0u, instead.
The type of ~0 is int,
and the value of ~0 depends on binary representation.
In sign and magnitude, ~0 is -INT_MAX.
In one's complement ~0 is negative zero, equal to zero.
Assignement is by value.

> Would these always work? (I only care about machines with 2's
> complement arithmetic).

Since it's easy to avoid two's complement issues, you should.

--
pete

Alex Fraser
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005
"pete" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> John Devereux wrote:
> > I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
> > ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
> > variable (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).
> >
> > E.g. assume "a" is unsigned, but could be char, short, int or long.
> >
> > a = -1;

>
> Yes, always
>
> > or
> >
> > a = ~0;

>
> Should be ~0u, instead.

But that will only set up to as many bits as there are in an (unsigned) int.
~0 will always work for two's complement because it produces the value -1
(of type int), making it equivalent to the first method. However, as you
pointed out, it produces different values for other signed integer
representations.

Alex

Dik T. Winter
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005
In article <(E-Mail Removed)> http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) writes:
> John Devereux wrote:
> > I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
> > ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
> > variable (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).

....
> > E.g. assume "a" is unsigned, but could be char, short, int or long.
> > a = -1;

>
> Yes, always
>
> > a = ~0;

>
> Should be ~0u, instead.
> The type of ~0 is int,
> and the value of ~0 depends on binary representation.
> In sign and magnitude, ~0 is -INT_MAX.
> In one's complement ~0 is negative zero, equal to zero.
> Assignement is by value.

Yup, the value is not -1, but all bits are set to 1. This contradicts
your first "yes always".
--
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/

pete
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005
Alex Fraser wrote:
>
> "pete" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> > John Devereux wrote:
> > > I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
> > > ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
> > > variable
> > > (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).
> > >
> > > E.g. assume "a" is unsigned,
> > > but could be char, short, int or long.
> > >
> > > a = -1;

> >
> > Yes, always
> >
> > > or
> > >
> > > a = ~0;

> >
> > Should be ~0u, instead.

>
> But that will only set up to as many bits
> as there are in an (unsigned) int.
> ~0 will always work for two's complement because
> it produces the value -1 (of type int),
> making it equivalent to the first method. However, as you
> pointed out, it produces different values for other signed integer
> representations.

I neglected to read this part:

> > > but could be char, short, int or long.

--
pete

Flash Gordon
Guest
Posts: n/a

 05-19-2005
John Devereux wrote:
> I was wondering what is the "best" way to set a variable to "all
> ones". In particular where I do not know the precise type of the
> variable (or more accurately, when I don't want to worry about it!).
>
> E.g. assume "a" is unsigned, but could be char, short, int or long.
>
> a = -1;
>
> or
>
> a = ~0;
>
> Would these always work? (I only care about machines with 2's
> complement arithmetic).

For any unsigned type on any system (even those that are not 2s complement)
a = -1;
This is because of the way conversion to unsigned types is defined in C.

I think that a = ~1; will work on a 2s complement machine because it
takes a signed int 0, inverts all bits giving you a signed int -1, then
the rules for assigning -1 to an unsigned int make it work.

So in this instance there is no real cost to making it fully portable.
--
Flash Gordon
Living in interesting times.
Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.

 Thread Tools

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post davidr@sharpesoft.com ASP .Net 2 08-22-2006 09:30 PM davidr@sharpesoft.com ASP .Net 0 08-21-2006 11:55 PM Sile Python 5 08-18-2006 08:13 AM CJ Java 1 10-29-2004 07:51 PM Srinivasa Raghavan Sethuraman ASP .Net 0 06-30-2004 10:05 AM

Advertisments