«

As many of you may have heard, last year a fist fight broke out in a hotel
room the night before a tech conference in Los Vegas. As a result, two
keynote speakers involved in the dispute spent the entire weekend in jail
and entire event was almost cancelled. So can we please settle this issue
now?

When a group of Microsoft certs go in together on a hooker, is there an
official "pecking order"? Is it MCSDs first, followed by MCADs and then the
MCPs; or is basically just first come first serve? Also would a MCSD.NET
cert have priority over with someone with just a MCSD 6.0 certification?



"swingers" <> wrote in message
news:...
> swingers wanted
>
>
>
>
> www.sasteam.us/bullet/index.html

actually, the mcse +i gets first crack at the whore

<WKidd> wrote in message news:upB$...
> As many of you may have heard, last year a fist fight broke out in a hotel
> room the night before a tech conference in Los Vegas. As a result, two
> keynote speakers involved in the dispute spent the entire weekend in jail
> and entire event was almost cancelled. So can we please settle this issue
> now?
>
> When a group of Microsoft certs go in together on a hooker, is there an
> official "pecking order"? Is it MCSDs first, followed by MCADs and then
the
> MCPs; or is basically just first come first serve? Also would a MCSD.NET
> cert have priority over with someone with just a MCSD 6.0 certification?
>
>
>
> "swingers" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > swingers wanted
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.sasteam.us/bullet/index.html
>
>

Consultant wrote:
> actually, the mcse +i gets first crack at the whore

Let's don't be silly. The ones with the smallest "members" go first, so as
to not damage the merchandise. Sadly, I always seem to be last in line.

--
Fris "Besides, MCNGP would trump them all in that 'pecking' order" bee®
MCNGP #13

http://www.mcngp.tk
The MCNGP Team - We're here to help

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics
Certaholics - We're here if you're beyond help

Both you and the mcse at the same time? Well that's one way to avoid a
fight. But what if there is a mcdba who insists on being first in line too;
where would he fit in?

"Consultant" <> wrote in message
news:...
> actually, the mcse +i gets first crack at the whore
>
> <WKidd> wrote in message news:upB$...
> > As many of you may have heard, last year a fist fight broke out in a
hotel
> > room the night before a tech conference in Los Vegas. As a result, two
> > keynote speakers involved in the dispute spent the entire weekend in
jail
> > and entire event was almost cancelled. So can we please settle this
issue
> > now?
> >
> > When a group of Microsoft certs go in together on a hooker, is there an
> > official "pecking order"? Is it MCSDs first, followed by MCADs and then
> the
> > MCPs; or is basically just first come first serve? Also would a MCSD.NET
> > cert have priority over with someone with just a MCSD 6.0 certification?
> >
> >
> >
> > "swingers" <> wrote in message
> > news:...
> > > swingers wanted
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > www.sasteam.us/bullet/index.html
> >
> >
>
>

depends on his stored procedure
ya see, the webhead is the front end, without it, there is no getting to the
data. and don't go trying to pull some fat client crap on me either.


<WKidd> wrote in message news:...
> Both you and the mcse at the same time? Well that's one way to avoid a
> fight. But what if there is a mcdba who insists on being first in line
too;
> where would he fit in?
>
> "Consultant" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > actually, the mcse +i gets first crack at the whore
> >
> > <WKidd> wrote in message news:upB$...
> > > As many of you may have heard, last year a fist fight broke out in a
> hotel
> > > room the night before a tech conference in Los Vegas. As a result, two
> > > keynote speakers involved in the dispute spent the entire weekend in
> jail
> > > and entire event was almost cancelled. So can we please settle this
> issue
> > > now?
> > >
> > > When a group of Microsoft certs go in together on a hooker, is there
an
> > > official "pecking order"? Is it MCSDs first, followed by MCADs and
then
> > the
> > > MCPs; or is basically just first come first serve? Also would a
MCSD.NET
> > > cert have priority over with someone with just a MCSD 6.0
certification?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "swingers" <> wrote in message
> > > news:...
> > > > swingers wanted
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > www.sasteam.us/bullet/index.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Actually the MCSE makes the initial call and sets up the location
The MCSD does all the work,
and the MCDBA shoots video and cleans the room after making backups of
the tapes.





On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:53:50 -0800, "Consultant"
<> wrote:

>depends on his stored procedure
>ya see, the webhead is the front end, without it, there is no getting to the
>data. and don't go trying to pull some fat client crap on me either.
>
>
><WKidd> wrote in message news:...
>> Both you and the mcse at the same time? Well that's one way to avoid a
>> fight. But what if there is a mcdba who insists on being first in line
>too;
>> where would he fit in?
>>
>> "Consultant" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>> > actually, the mcse +i gets first crack at the whore
>> >
>> > <WKidd> wrote in message news:upB$...
>> > > As many of you may have heard, last year a fist fight broke out in a
>> hotel
>> > > room the night before a tech conference in Los Vegas. As a result, two
>> > > keynote speakers involved in the dispute spent the entire weekend in
>> jail
>> > > and entire event was almost cancelled. So can we please settle this
>> issue
>> > > now?
>> > >
>> > > When a group of Microsoft certs go in together on a hooker, is there
>an
>> > > official "pecking order"? Is it MCSDs first, followed by MCADs and
>then
>> > the
>> > > MCPs; or is basically just first come first serve? Also would a
>MCSD.NET
>> > > cert have priority over with someone with just a MCSD 6.0
>certification?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "swingers" <> wrote in message
>> > > news:...
>> > > > swingers wanted
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > www.sasteam.us/bullet/index.html
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>