.NET vs 6.0: Analyzing Requirements & Defining Solution Architectures

Hi Guys,

My first post on here so go easy

I'm an MCSD for Visual Studio 6.0, thinking of starting
down the .NET route.

What are the differences between the VS6 Exam 100
Analyzing Requirements and Defining Solution Architectures
and the MCSD.NET equivilent?

Thanks in advance,
Jamie.
Bristol, UK.

Jamie Thomson

>What are the differences between the VS6 Exam 100
>Analyzing Requirements and Defining Solution Architectures
>and the MCSD.NET equivilent?

More or less as the title says. However, in practice there is not a
massive amount of difference, although the case studies (certainly in
the beta) are somewhat less convoluted.

Kline Sphere

I agree. Very similar, but 300 is more straightforward.
Virtually no difference in approach - well, 300 is a bit
more web-oriented.

J Jones
MCSD, MCSD.net


>-----Original Message-----
>>What are the differences between the VS6 Exam 100
>>Analyzing Requirements and Defining Solution
Architectures
>>and the MCSD.NET equivilent?
>
>More or less as the title says. However, in practice
there is not a
>massive amount of difference, although the case studies
(certainly in
>the beta) are somewhat less convoluted.
>.
>

jj

The 70-300 is surely more straightforward. But the good
thing baout it is - it is easier to study for 70-300
because the official curriculum is pretty good (better the
70-100)
>-----Original Message-----
>I agree. Very similar, but 300 is more straightforward.
>Virtually no difference in approach - well, 300 is a bit
>more web-oriented.
>
>J Jones
>MCSD, MCSD.net
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>>What are the differences between the VS6 Exam 100
>>>Analyzing Requirements and Defining Solution
>Architectures
>>>and the MCSD.NET equivilent?
>>
>>More or less as the title says. However, in practice
>there is not a
>>massive amount of difference, although the case studies
>(certainly in
>>the beta) are somewhat less convoluted.
>>.
>>
>.
>

Sarang Datye