|
|
|
|
11-22-2003, 10:10 PM
|
#1 |
MCSD C++
Why Microsoft want close this(MCSD Visual C++)
certification? slayeek |
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 11:28 AM
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
slayeek wrote:
> Why Microsoft want close this(MCSD Visual C++) > certification? Presumably to move as many people as possible onto languages they effectively control totally. Paul Robson |
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 12:33 PM
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
>Presumably to move as many people as possible onto languages they
>effectively control totally. Yep, C++ is not proprietary where as vb & c# are. Kline Sphere |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 09:38 AM
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
you are absolutely right. "Paul Robson" <> wrote in message news:bpq5kv$oqh$... > slayeek wrote: > > Why Microsoft want close this(MCSD Visual C++) > > certification? > > Presumably to move as many people as possible onto languages they > effectively control totally. > Joe |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 03:55 PM
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
Kline Sphere wrote:
>>Presumably to move as many people as possible onto languages they >>effectively control totally. > > > Yep, C++ is not proprietary where as vb & c# are. I thought C# had been pushed through the ECMA. General Protection Fault |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 04:45 PM
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
I also heard the C# and a part of .NET platform is an ECMA standard. Any
company can grab the specification and create their own tools, compilers, translators, etc. BTW: ECMA refused to standarized Java a few years ago, so go for .NET and C#! Anyway I passed MSDN exams for VC++ last year and I am happy with it. There are plenty of so called legacy code (eg. COM components) that I have to deal with. If I did not have any knowledge about this stuff I would have really hard time even though I am developing for .NET right now. Leszek Taratuta "General Protection Fault" <> wrote in message news:... > Kline Sphere wrote: > > >>Presumably to move as many people as possible onto languages they > >>effectively control totally. > > > > > > Yep, C++ is not proprietary where as vb & c# are. > > I thought C# had been pushed through the ECMA. > Leszek |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 08:21 PM
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
>I thought C# had been pushed through the ECMA.
I has been. So was ActiveX - for while, until ms chucked all their toys out of the pram. Kline Sphere |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 08:22 PM
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
>I also heard the C# and a part of .NET platform is an ECMA standard. Any
>company can grab the specification and create their own tools, compilers, >translators, etc. I wonder how much money those companies that produced COM for Unix made? Kline Sphere |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 09:20 PM
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
What does this mean?
>until ms chucked all their >toys out of the pram. C# chucked out of the pram too? (C# pushed through the ECMA.) >I has been. So was ActiveX - for while, until ms chucked all their >toys out of the pram. >. > |
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 09:30 PM
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Re: MCSD C++
>C# chucked out of the pram too?
If too many changes are recommenced which ms do not agree to, then yes the same will happen; they will take their new toy away so no one else can play with it. Kline Sphere |
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RE: MCTS Exams | Willy David Jr | MCTS | 1 | 08-21-2009 07:51 PM |
| All Latest braindumps for MCSD, CCNP, CCNA, MCSE 2003 | sasso | MCTS | 0 | 02-26-2009 08:33 AM |
| All Latest braindumps for MCSD, CCNP, CCNA, MCSE 2003 | Haoon | MCITP | 0 | 02-26-2009 04:16 AM |
| Which Certfication???????? | Supriya | MCTS | 4 | 12-29-2007 05:47 PM |
| MCTS OR MCSD | Ven | MCTS | 3 | 01-09-2007 03:54 AM |
