Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > IOS IPSec routing

Reply
Thread Tools

IOS IPSec routing

 
 
response3
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-26-2007
Hi all,

I have a 2851 router w/ IOS Adv. Services, w/ a point to point IPSec
VPN setup to another 2811 router. I also am planning to setup a
point-to-point T1 setup between these same two routers. My question is
this:

Do IPSec VPN's use the default route for traffic? Or is there a
'hidden' route statement built when you create a VPN?

Assuming that typical Internet-based point to point VPN's use the
default route, if I were to setup a GRE tunnel and run OSPF between the
T1 routers, I would expect traffic to these sites to be routed via the
T1, and in the event that the T1 link drops, it would be routed out via
the default route, and thus, encrypted for VPN.

Am I correct in this assumption? Thanks all.

Brian

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Bod43@hotmail.co.uk
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-27-2007


On 26 Jan, 22:37, "response3" <i...@atomitek.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a 2851 router w/ IOS Adv. Services, w/ a point to point IPSec
> VPN setup to another 2811 router. I also am planning to setup a
> point-to-point T1 setup between these same two routers. My question is
> this:
>
> Do IPSec VPN's use the default route for traffic? Or is there a
> 'hidden' route statement built when you create a VPN?

No hidden routes. Just the same routing as always.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk64...80133ddd.shtml
May assist.

> Assuming that typical Internet-based point to point VPN's use the
> default route, if I were to setup a GRE tunnel and run OSPF between the
> T1 routers, I would expect traffic to these sites to be routed via the
> T1, and in the event that the T1 link drops, it would be routed out via
> the default route, and thus, encrypted for VPN.

More or less.

The router can get routes from many sources, static,
ospf, RIP, bgp.

The rules for selecting which route to use are complex
but boil down to:-

More specific routes are preferred over less specific.
10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 is better than
10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 which is better than
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 - i.e. default route.

In your scenario, the OSPF routes will be more specifc
than the default route and so will be preferred. EXCEPT
in the case of a default route received over OSPF.

When routes are equally specific then the "administrative
distance" comes into play.

The AD of OSPF is (IIRC) 120 which is LESS
preferred than the default AD of a static route (1).

If you did have an OSPF default route that you wanted to be
preferred over a static route you could change your static
route to have a high AD.

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 200

This is sometimes refered to as a "floating static route".

Hopefully this will let you find some appropriate
documents on CCO.

Good luck.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
instructions on how to perform an IOS upgrade on a Catalyst 6500 switch (IOS to IOS) Mike Rahl Cisco 1 05-30-2007 05:22 PM
4506 acting as LNS with L2TP over IPsec and IPsec over L2TP. AM Cisco 0 02-20-2007 09:00 AM
4506 acting as LNS with L2TP over IPsec and IPsec over L2TP. AM Cisco 1 02-20-2007 07:20 AM
IPsec within L2TP over IPsec - PIX. AM Cisco 0 07-23-2006 10:14 PM
IPSec vs. L2TP/IPsec vs. PPTP David Cisco 0 01-07-2004 04:03 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57