«

Dear all,

It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library as
the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when I
go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article there
are about the specific development tech , not system
design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
next week i will take the exam.

I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
book. After I have read it twice and finish it's practice
test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the MSF
process. I feel it is a little big differen than the true
exam.

Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.

Robert

So Rich, What you said Exam Cram book, is it a ebook? Is
it free?

Robert
>-----Original Message-----
>That's why I liked the Exam Cram book. It seems to be a
>lot more relevant to the actual exam that either the
>Microsoft Study Guide or the Osbourne book. I don't know
>of any other study guides for 70-300.
>
>I read through Exam Cram and the review questions, etc.
in
>each chapter. When I found a topic where information in
>the book was not familiar to me, I read MSDN articles for
>more thorough information. In some cases the articles
are
>probably more detailed than anything addressed by exam
>questions, but I found it helpful to get all the
>background. Don't try to remember all the details but
use
>it to understand things better. This will put you in a
>better position to handle the problem-solving you need to
>do in the exam.
>
>That's what worked for me, anyway - others may have
>another approach.
>
>Good Luck
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Dear all,
>>
>>It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library as
>>the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when
I
>>go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article there
>>are about the specific development tech , not system
>>design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
>>some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
>>next week i will take the exam.
>>
>>I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
>>book. After I have read it twice and finish it's
practice
>>test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the
MSF
>>process. I feel it is a little big differen than the
true
>>exam.
>>
>>Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.
>>
>>Robert
>>.
>>
>.
>

Try to download the demo from www.transcender.com.
I just passed it yesterday.
It's all about paying attention to details

Marc M
MCSD (6, .NET)

robert wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library as
> the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when I
> go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article there
> are about the specific development tech , not system
> design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
> some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
> next week i will take the exam.
>
> I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
> book. After I have read it twice and finish it's practice
> test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the MSF
> process. I feel it is a little big differen than the true
> exam.
>
> Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.
>
> Robert

It costs about 20 bucks...here's the deal:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-
/0789729296/qid=1064546989/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_2/103-5499994-
5256623?v=glance&s=books&n=507846


>-----Original Message-----
>So Rich, What you said Exam Cram book, is it a ebook? Is
>it free?
>
>Robert
>>-----Original Message-----
>>That's why I liked the Exam Cram book. It seems to be
a
>>lot more relevant to the actual exam that either the
>>Microsoft Study Guide or the Osbourne book. I don't
know
>>of any other study guides for 70-300.
>>
>>I read through Exam Cram and the review questions, etc.
>in
>>each chapter. When I found a topic where information
in
>>the book was not familiar to me, I read MSDN articles
for
>>more thorough information. In some cases the articles
>are
>>probably more detailed than anything addressed by exam
>>questions, but I found it helpful to get all the
>>background. Don't try to remember all the details but
>use
>>it to understand things better. This will put you in a
>>better position to handle the problem-solving you need
to
>>do in the exam.
>>
>>That's what worked for me, anyway - others may have
>>another approach.
>>
>>Good Luck
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>Dear all,
>>>
>>>It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library
as
>>>the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when
>I
>>>go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article
there
>>>are about the specific development tech , not system
>>>design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
>>>some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
>>>next week i will take the exam.
>>>
>>>I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
>>>book. After I have read it twice and finish it's
>practice
>>>test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the
>MSF
>>>process. I feel it is a little big differen than the
>true
>>>exam.
>>>
>>>Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.
>>>
>>>Robert
>>>.
>>>
>>.
>>
>.
>

Thanks Rich, But this time i have no time to buy and read
the book before my test(next Tuesday). Hopefully I don't
need it any more.

Robert
>-----Original Message-----
>It costs about 20 bucks...here's the deal:
>
>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-
>/0789729296/qid=1064546989/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_2/103-5499994-
>5256623?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>So Rich, What you said Exam Cram book, is it a ebook? Is
>>it free?
>>
>>Robert
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>That's why I liked the Exam Cram book. It seems to be
>a
>>>lot more relevant to the actual exam that either the
>>>Microsoft Study Guide or the Osbourne book. I don't
>know
>>>of any other study guides for 70-300.
>>>
>>>I read through Exam Cram and the review questions, etc.
>>in
>>>each chapter. When I found a topic where information
>in
>>>the book was not familiar to me, I read MSDN articles
>for
>>>more thorough information. In some cases the articles
>>are
>>>probably more detailed than anything addressed by exam
>>>questions, but I found it helpful to get all the
>>>background. Don't try to remember all the details but
>>use
>>>it to understand things better. This will put you in a
>>>better position to handle the problem-solving you need
>to
>>>do in the exam.
>>>
>>>That's what worked for me, anyway - others may have
>>>another approach.
>>>
>>>Good Luck
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library
>as
>>>>the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when
>>I
>>>>go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article
>there
>>>>are about the specific development tech , not system
>>>>design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
>>>>some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
>>>>next week i will take the exam.
>>>>
>>>>I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
>>>>book. After I have read it twice and finish it's
>>practice
>>>>test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the
>>MSF
>>>>process. I feel it is a little big differen than the
>>true
>>>>exam.
>>>>
>>>>Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.
>>>>
>>>>Robert
>>>>.
>>>>
>>>.
>>>
>>.
>>
>.
>

Very true. As others have said, a lot of the answers can
be gotten by just reading the case study and the
questions very carefully.

>-----Original Message-----
>Try to download the demo from www.transcender.com.
>I just passed it yesterday.
>It's all about paying attention to details
>
>Marc M
>MCSD (6, .NET)
>
>robert wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> It seems many people in this group used MSDN Library
as
>> the best resource to prepare for 70-300 test. But when
I
>> go to the msdn , I found most of technicle article
there
>> are about the specific development tech , not system
>> design which the exam emphasis. So can anyone give me
>> some advice to find the relevant source in MSDN since
>> next week i will take the exam.
>>
>> I already bought the Microsoft Self-paced Training Kit
>> book. After I have read it twice and finish it's
practice
>> test. I found it is too abstract and too emphasis the
MSF
>> process. I feel it is a little big differen than the
true
>> exam.
>>
>> Ok, looking forward to hearing from you.
>>
>> Robert
>
>.
>