«

Scott W wrote:
> Philippe wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot
>> on
>> a computer..
>>
>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>
>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>
>> Thks
>>
>>
>> P.
>
> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most
> of it.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>
> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS
> method.
>
> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure
> BS.
>

Subtitle:
"Revealing Yout Inner Drake"

"Frank ess" <> wrote in message
news: ...
> Scott W wrote:
>> Philippe wrote:
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot on
>>> a computer..
>>>
>>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>>
>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>>
>>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>>
>>> Thks
>>>
>>>
>>> P.
>>
>> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most
>> of it.
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>>
>> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS
>> method.
>>
>> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
>> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure BS.
>>
>
> Subtitle:
> "Revealing Yout Inner Drake"

very interesting,
the original picture is of a female mallard, yours is showing a male
mallard,
i get the impresion that you have cheated

the original http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261

mine http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5190024

yours http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original

bongo wrote:
> "Frank ess" <> wrote in message
> news: ...
>> Scott W wrote:
>>> Philippe wrote:
>>>> Hi All
>>>>
>>>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot
>>>> on a computer..
>>>>
>>>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>>>
>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>>>
>>>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>>>
>>>> Thks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.
>>>
>>> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most
>>> of it.
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>>>
>>> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS
>>> method.
>>>
>>> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
>>> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure
>>> BS.
>>
>> Subtitle:
>> "Revealing Yout Inner Drake"
>
> very interesting,
> the original picture is of a female mallard, yours is showing a male
> mallard,
> i get the impresion that you have cheated

All you got was an *impression*??



--
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
www.pbase.com/markuson

"Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
news:XV85h.378$...
> bongo wrote:
>> "Frank ess" <> wrote in message
>> news: ...
>>> Scott W wrote:
>>>> Philippe wrote:
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot
>>>>> on a computer..
>>>>>
>>>>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> P.
>>>>
>>>> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most
>>>> of it.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>>>>
>>>> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS
>>>> method.
>>>>
>>>> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
>>>> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure
>>>> BS.
>>>
>>> Subtitle:
>>> "Revealing Yout Inner Drake"
>>
>> very interesting,
>> the original picture is of a female mallard, yours is showing a male
>> mallard,
>> i get the impresion that you have cheated
>
> All you got was an *impression*??
>
>
>
> --
> Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:


just being polite

bongo wrote:
> "Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
> news:XV85h.378$...
> > bongo wrote:
> >> "Frank ess" <> wrote in message
> >> news: ...
> >>> Scott W wrote:
> >>>> Philippe wrote:
> >>>>> Hi All
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot
> >>>>> on a computer..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.
> >>>>
> >>>> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most
> >>>> of it.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
> >>>>
> >>>> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS
> >>>> method.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
> >>>> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure
> >>>> BS.
> >>>
> >>> Subtitle:
> >>> "Revealing Yout Inner Drake"
> >>
> >> very interesting,
> >> the original picture is of a female mallard, yours is showing a male
> >> mallard,
> >> i get the impresion that you have cheated
> >
> > All you got was an *impression*??
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
>
>
> just being polite

That is the problem in the world today, just not enough trust.

Scott

Scott W wrote:
> Philippe wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot on a
>> computer..
>>
>> I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>
>> I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>
>> Thks
>>
>>
>> P.
>
> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most of
> it.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>
> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS method.
>
> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure BS.
>
> Scott
>
Sorry, but I've already mastered the BS method, so this technique, while
interesting, is hardly new to me.. (8 years in the military.. I mean
come on.. if *anybody* can BS.....)



P.

Scott W wrote:
> Philippe wrote:
>
>>Hi All
>>
>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot on a
>>computer..
>>
>>I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>
>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>
>>I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>
>>Thks
>>
>>
>>P.
>
>
> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most of
> it.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>
> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS method.
>
> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure BS.
>
> Scott
>

A bit too much grain. A little more postprocessing never hurts...
<http://www.theknack.net/duck.jpg>

"timeOday" <timeOday-> wrote in message
news:. ..
> Scott W wrote:
>> Philippe wrote:
>>
>>>Hi All
>>>
>>> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot on a
>>>computer..
>>>
>>>I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>>>
>>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>>>
>>>I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.
>>>
>>>Thks
>>>
>>>
>>>P.
>>
>>
>> I had a hard time pulling out any good detail but I think I got most of
>> it.
>>
>> http://www.pbase.com/konascott/image/70008418/original
>>
>> I used the binomial synthesis method, otherwise known as the BS method.
>>
>> Since I found I only needed to use the binomial synthesis method, no
>> other adjustments were needed, my version would be considered pure BS.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>
> A bit too much grain. A little more postprocessing never hurts...
> <http://www.theknack.net/duck.jpg>

That is probably a male?

Off topic, but how's the distal humerus?

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:47:23 GMT, Philippe
<> wrote:

>Hi All
>
> I'm still using P/S (can't justify DSLR yet) but I'm not that hot on a
>computer..
>
>I've got a basic unaltered shot here..
>
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5133261
>
>I'd love to see what can be done with it, if anything.


Here's a straightforward application of the
Shadows/Highlights tool in CS2:

<http://www.terrapinphoto.com/5133261-md-tweak.jpg>

One could push much harder on the controls --
but I chose not to. There was no masking involved.


rafe b
www.terrapinphoto.com