On 4 Nov 2006 05:13:32 -0800,
wrote:
>I still have time to cancel out the Rebel XTi 400D order. What is the
>cheapest full frame sensor camera, and does it obviate the need to
>purchase additional lenses in order to be worth the money?
As others have pointed out, the Canon is the cheapest full-frame DSLR
being marketed now.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5d/
Does it obviate the need to purchase additional lenses in order to be
worth the money? Depends. What lenses do you have now? How good do you
want your pics to be? The 5D will take advantage of the best lenses
you can buy. Canon makes some very nice "L" series lenses that are of
very good quality, and Canon's pride in these lenses is evident in
their prices.
But I would caution you; since your knowledge of DSLRs doesn't seem to
extend beyond setting the camera to full auto mode and not
understanding why the camera does what it does, it might be better to
stick with the XTi to gain some basic understanding of the interaction
between the shutter speed, aperture and ISO settings, and how you can
manipulate them to get what you want, before you buy a 5D. (If you
don't know how to drive, buying a $100,000 car makes little sense.)
Gain some knowledge (there are many fine on-line tutorials, and a
*lot* of good books on basic photography principles) first, then see
what suits your needs and proficiency level. Don't fall for the "full
frame uber alles" idea; full frame isn't a necessity for good
pictures. What's far more important is a knowledge of how to use what
you have. There's nothing wrong with the XTI; it has a lot of the
functionality the 5D has. The APS-C sensor isn't a drawback, it's just
smaller than full frame. For many (myself included), the crop factor
that, in effect, multiplies the focal length of a lens by 1.6x is an
advantage. If you don't need wide angle, there's no problem. If you
do, there are several lenses that go down to 10mm (16mm equilivant on
the XTI).
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"