«

Hi All,

I've uploaded the comparison between the 350D and 400D to:
<http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/cameras/camtests.php>

There are four articles with minimally compressed JPEGs plus all the RAW
files for you to make you own conclusions.

Cheers,

Wayne

Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Coordindinator of Studies, Multimedia and Photomedia, Australian Academy
of Design
Personal art site http://www.artinyourface.com/

Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've uploaded the comparison between the 350D and 400D to:
> <http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/cameras/camtests.php>
>
> There are four articles with minimally compressed JPEGs plus all the RAW
> files for you to make you own conclusions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> Wayne J. Cosshall
> Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
> Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
> Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
> http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
> Coordindinator of Studies, Multimedia and Photomedia, Australian Academy
> of Design
> Personal art site http://www.artinyourface.com/

It is very interesting how the night shots with the 400D seem to be much
sharper but just the opposite in daylight.

Rod Williams wrote:
> Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've uploaded the comparison between the 350D and 400D to:
>> <http://www.dimagemaker.com/specials/cameras/camtests.php>
>>
>> There are four articles with minimally compressed JPEGs plus all the
>> RAW files for you to make you own conclusions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> Wayne J. Cosshall
>> Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
>> Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
>> Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
>> http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
>> Coordindinator of Studies, Multimedia and Photomedia, Australian
>> Academy of Design
>> Personal art site http://www.artinyourface.com/
>
> It is very interesting how the night shots with the 400D seem to be much
> sharper but just the opposite in daylight.

I noticed that too. I have no idea why but I will do some further
testing and see if I can figure it out.

Cheers,

Wayne


--
Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/

"Wayne J. Cosshall" <> wrote in message
news:4537dff6$0$1351$ ...
> > It is very interesting how the night shots with the 400D seem to be much
> > sharper but just the opposite in daylight.
>
> I noticed that too. I have no idea why but I will do some further
> testing and see if I can figure it out.

Given the difference in brightness and contrast between the picture pairs,
all I can say is the camera's are very close, just as I would have expected.
And the main thing to be learned, as you already state, is that there is no
real noise penalty to be paid for the higher pixel count.
I haven't tried playing with the raw files myself though to match them more
closely, it wouldn't prove anything I want to know anyway

MrT.