«

I just received a Canon A630 today and every photo I took of my kids
this evening has very bad red-eye, regardless of the distance to the
camera. The red-eye reduction is "on" but it doesn't seem to do
anything. It looks to me like the red-eye lamp is the same as the
auto-focus lamp (has a yellow color). Do you think I'm doing something
wrong or do you think there might be something wrong with the camera?
Any help would really be appreciated. Other than the red-eye, the
camera takes great pictures. Thank you! Ethan

On 12 Oct 2006 20:01:04 -0700, wrote:

> I just received a Canon A630 today and every photo I took of my kids
> this evening has very bad red-eye, regardless of the distance to the
> camera. The red-eye reduction is "on" but it doesn't seem to do
> anything. It looks to me like the red-eye lamp is the same as the
> auto-focus lamp (has a yellow color). Do you think I'm doing something
> wrong or do you think there might be something wrong with the camera?
> Any help would really be appreciated. Other than the red-eye, the
> camera takes great pictures. Thank you! Ethan

The only thing you're doing wrong is assuming that a red-eye
reduction lamp is powerful enough to be effective. If it doesn't
force a large reduction in the pupil's diameter, the red-eye will
remain as bad as if it wasn't used. The pupil doesn't contract very
quickly anyway, as you can tell by how long it take for the eye to
adjust when leaving a dark room into bright sunlight or vice-versa.
You'd probably get much better results if you had the subjects look
at a movie flood lamp or a bare 100 watt incandescent bulb for
several seconds before turning them off and taking your pictures.
The anti red-eye lamps just aren't intense enough to be effective,
and if they were, they'd probably use more battery energy that the
flash itself, which would dramatically reduce the battery's
performance. You're better off disabling the anti red-eye lamp and
using more realistic methods to reduce red-eye, such as turning on
as many indoor lights as you can and trying to keep subject's eyes
as far from the lens axis as possible. But don't go too far, as
guests might balk if you try to hire an ophthalmologist to
administer Tropicamide or phenylephrine drops in their eyes.

"" <> writes:
>I just received a Canon A630 today and every photo I took of my kids
>this evening has very bad red-eye, regardless of the distance to the
>camera. The red-eye reduction is "on" but it doesn't seem to do
>anything. It looks to me like the red-eye lamp is the same as the
>auto-focus lamp (has a yellow color). Do you think I'm doing something
>wrong or do you think there might be something wrong with the camera?
>Any help would really be appreciated. Other than the red-eye, the
>camera takes great pictures. Thank you! Ethan

This is a common problem with almost all Point&Shoot cameras, both film
and digital, and also with SLRs that have pop-up flashes. When the
flash is close to the taking lens, the bright spot on the retina caused
by the flash is visible to the camera lens.

The possible solutions are:

1. Use an external flash that's further from the camera lens (usually
requires a high-end P&S or DSLR)

2. Turn off the flash and shoot by available light (but this generally
isn't practical indoors unless you have a DSLR)

3. Use software to remove the redeye after the fact.

Different cameras have different redeye reduction methods, but they
annoy the subject and aren't very effective in my experience.

Dave

wrote:

> I just received a Canon A630 today and every photo I took of my kids
> this evening has very bad red-eye, regardless of the distance to the
> camera. The red-eye reduction is "on" but it doesn't seem to do
> anything. It looks to me like the red-eye lamp is the same as the
> auto-focus lamp (has a yellow color). Do you think I'm doing
> something wrong or do you think there might be something wrong with
> the camera?
> Any help would really be appreciated. Other than the red-eye, the
> camera takes great pictures. Thank you! Ethan
You are probably using the in camera flash, whenever possible turn it
off and you will see better results.
--
Delete l to reply.

<> wrote in message
news: ps.com...
>I just received a Canon A630 today and every photo I took of my kids
> this evening has very bad red-eye, regardless of the distance to the
> camera. The red-eye reduction is "on" but it doesn't seem to do
> anything. It looks to me like the red-eye lamp is the same as the
> auto-focus lamp (has a yellow color). Do you think I'm doing something
> wrong or do you think there might be something wrong with the camera?
> Any help would really be appreciated. Other than the red-eye, the
> camera takes great pictures. Thank you! Ethan
>
It's simply the nature of the beast. The flash (strobe) is placed too close
to the camera lens, and you get a flash reflection from the subject's
retina, giving you "red-eye". A "red-eye function" that means pre-flashing
to force the pupil to close will only mean that you lose any chance of
getting a spontaneous picture due to the delay, and will not be entirely
effective in removing red-eye anyway. Just switch that function off, it's
worthless. An external flash will help, especially if you can bounce the
light off the ceiling - but such flashes tend to be big and rather
expensive. There is no flash hot shoe on the camera, I see; there is a "high
power flash" available but this, too, is designed to be mounted right next
to the camera so won't help much.

If you don't want redeye, and don't want to spend the time post-processing
the images on a PC, the only practical solution in most cases is to take
photographs without using flash at all. Good luck on that if you are
indoors, by the way - the required ISO value for that would usually be on
the north side of 800 and compact cameras in general suck badly at that, if
they offer it at all. This kind of stuff is difficult even using a DSLR with
a fast lens. You may be able to squeek by with ISO 800 (the 630 tops out at
this ISO I think) but image quality is not likely to be too impressive; the
maximum ISO available in a digicam tends to be something of a last-ditch
desperate effort kind of thing.

The built-in flash is great for use as a fill light when photographing in
daylight, for example if the sun is at the subject's back so that the face
is in shadow and needs a "lift". But considered as the main light-source in
a photo, it's not very useful.

Perhaps you can try to tape a piece of white tissue-paper in position over
the flash bulb, this will diffuse and soften the light somewhat and reduce
redeye, but will eat a lot of light and reduce the effective range of the
flash. It depends on how much flash power you have available to play with -
not a whole lot, in the case of a built-in one. You'll probably have to get
close to the subject.

But don't go too far, as
> guests might balk if you try to hire an ophthalmologist to
> administer Tropicamide or phenylephrine drops in their eyes.

Just a quick fact check, Tropicamide and phenylepherine will dilate
pupils not contract them. What you need is Pilocarpine, or RevEyes (but
that just negates dilating drops. When I do eye photography the
dilating drops help me out, doing essentially in focus red eye shots.
Kids have naturally large pupils in house light so increaasing the
ambient lght should help. My oldest son has very light irides and if I
take his picture with a P&S camera I not only get red pupils, the iris
of the eye also transmits red so it is almost imposible to correct a
photograph. Can make a spooky photo.

Tom

On 13 Oct 2006 05:37:54 -0700, tomm42 wrote:

>> guests might balk if you try to hire an ophthalmologist to
>> administer Tropicamide or phenylephrine drops in their eyes.
>
> Just a quick fact check, Tropicamide and phenylepherine will dilate
> pupils not contract them. What you need is Pilocarpine, or RevEyes (but
> that just negates dilating drops. When I do eye photography the
> dilating drops help me out, doing essentially in focus red eye shots.
> Kids have naturally large pupils in house light so increaasing the
> ambient lght should help. My oldest son has very light irides and if I
> take his picture with a P&S camera I not only get red pupils, the iris
> of the eye also transmits red so it is almost imposible to correct a
> photograph. Can make a spooky photo.

Oops . . . When I wrote that I was imagining the large, dilated
pupils that the drops would produce. It's not my eyes that are red.

I know what you mean about spooky photos, as I have a picture of a
nephew playing a video game, and the bright red glow from his eyes
makes it seem as if the alien is on his side of the video screen.

Thanks for everyone's replies. I guess I just don't recall the red-eye
being as much of a problem with my previous camers (Canon S400), but it
probably was. Thanks again! Ethan