«

ASAAR wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:44:41 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:
>
> > If someone wrote *two* not quite identical monographs, and they were
> > properly spaced, wouldn't that make a stereograph?
>
> Shhh. Say no more lest you give us away. Those are our lastest
> political talking points.

I hope you can do a good weird handshake whilst wearing one trouser
leg short and a small bowl of bananas on your head!

--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

"Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Neil Harrington wrote:
>>
>> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>> > Neil Harrington wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
>> >> news:...
>> >> > Joan wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> NO.... Twice.
>> >> >>
>> >> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
>> >> > slowly across the silvery skies.
>> >>
>> >> Wending, winding or wandering, why is everyone reading this thread
>> >> when
>> >> the
>> >> OP clearly directed "DO NOT READ" right there in the title?
>> >>
>> >> I think there is an important psychological principle at work here.
>> >> Someone
>> >> should write a monograph.
>> >>
>> >> Neil
>> >
>> > Or a stereograph? I'm not too keen on mono, especially mono-liths, who
>> > would want a statue or column in one ear when you can have two?
>>
>> The very thought of having statues or columns in both ears makes my teeth
>> hurt. Better in both ears than in both eyes, I suppose, though it would
>> call
>> for strong neck muscles either way.
>>
>> If someone wrote *two* not quite identical monographs, and they were
>> properly spaced, wouldn't that make a stereograph?
>>
>> Neil
>
> I would say so, but we could go all the way and have a small classic
> structure round our heads by going for a quadrograph. It would
> probably date quite quickly,

Of course. It would be quickly replaced by the sextograph.


> but not as quickly as the 8-track
> cartridge player, which dated almost as soon as it met a girl.

Isn't that what the "sex" in sextograph is for?

Neil

"ASAAR" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:44:41 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:
>
>> If someone wrote *two* not quite identical monographs, and they were
>> properly spaced, wouldn't that make a stereograph?
>
> Shhh. Say no more lest you give us away. Those are our lastest
> political talking points.

Oops.

Neil

Neil Harrington wrote:
>
> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > Neil Harrington wrote:
> >>
> >> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >> > Neil Harrington wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> >> >> news:...
> >> >> > Joan wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> NO.... Twice.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
> >> >> > slowly across the silvery skies.
> >> >>
> >> >> Wending, winding or wandering, why is everyone reading this thread
> >> >> when
> >> >> the
> >> >> OP clearly directed "DO NOT READ" right there in the title?
> >> >>
> >> >> I think there is an important psychological principle at work here.
> >> >> Someone
> >> >> should write a monograph.
> >> >>
> >> >> Neil
> >> >
> >> > Or a stereograph? I'm not too keen on mono, especially mono-liths, who
> >> > would want a statue or column in one ear when you can have two?
> >>
> >> The very thought of having statues or columns in both ears makes my teeth
> >> hurt. Better in both ears than in both eyes, I suppose, though it would
> >> call
> >> for strong neck muscles either way.
> >>
> >> If someone wrote *two* not quite identical monographs, and they were
> >> properly spaced, wouldn't that make a stereograph?
> >>
> >> Neil
> >
> > I would say so, but we could go all the way and have a small classic
> > structure round our heads by going for a quadrograph. It would
> > probably date quite quickly,
>
> Of course. It would be quickly replaced by the sextograph.
>
Gillette or Wilinsons sword?

> > but not as quickly as the 8-track
> > cartridge player, which dated almost as soon as it met a girl.
>
> Isn't that what the "sex" in sextograph is for?
>
as long as they get hold of a condomophone or prophelacticapedia
first.


--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

"Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Stewy wrote:
>>
>> In article <>,
>> Paul Heslop <> wrote:
>>
>> > Joan wrote:
>> > >
>> > > NO.... Twice.
>> > >
>> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
>> > slowly across the silvery skies.
>>
>> Is there a word for four times, or even five for that matter?
>>
>> Just asking...
>
> Quintuple? I never had my tuples quinned though, it sounds quite
> painful.

I knew a girl named Quinn, but I never could get her to tuple.

Neil

"Stewy" <> wrote in message
news:anyone4tennis-...
> In article <ee9unq$s9l$>,
> "Patrick Devoy" <> wrote:
>
>> Test
>
> S***, I read it! Will I go blind? Mammy!!!!

I don't know, I can't see anything.

Neil Harrington wrote:
>
> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > Stewy wrote:
> >>
> >> In article <>,
> >> Paul Heslop <> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Joan wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > NO.... Twice.
> >> > >
> >> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
> >> > slowly across the silvery skies.
> >>
> >> Is there a word for four times, or even five for that matter?
> >>
> >> Just asking...
> >
> > Quintuple? I never had my tuples quinned though, it sounds quite
> > painful.
>
> I knew a girl named Quinn, but I never could get her to tuple.
>
> Neil

I bet you wish she was called Sex, then you could just ignored tupling
and got right down to name calling.

--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

"Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Neil Harrington wrote:
>>
>> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>> > Stewy wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In article <>,
>> >> Paul Heslop <> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Joan wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > NO.... Twice.
>> >> > >
>> >> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
>> >> > slowly across the silvery skies.
>> >>
>> >> Is there a word for four times, or even five for that matter?
>> >>
>> >> Just asking...
>> >
>> > Quintuple? I never had my tuples quinned though, it sounds quite
>> > painful.
>>
>> I knew a girl named Quinn, but I never could get her to tuple.
>>
>> Neil
>
> I bet you wish she was called Sex, then you could just ignored tupling
> and got right down to name calling.

Actually, Sex was her middle name, but she never would tuple. She'd do
anything else, but tupling was out.

Neil

Neil Harrington wrote:
>
> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > Neil Harrington wrote:
> >>
> >> "Paul Heslop" <> wrote in message
> >> news:...
> >> > Stewy wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In article <>,
> >> >> Paul Heslop <> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Joan wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > NO.... Twice.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > or thrice, if the feeling takes us, and it does, wending its way
> >> >> > slowly across the silvery skies.
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there a word for four times, or even five for that matter?
> >> >>
> >> >> Just asking...
> >> >
> >> > Quintuple? I never had my tuples quinned though, it sounds quite
> >> > painful.
> >>
> >> I knew a girl named Quinn, but I never could get her to tuple.
> >>
> >> Neil
> >
> > I bet you wish she was called Sex, then you could just ignored tupling
> > and got right down to name calling.
>
> Actually, Sex was her middle name, but she never would tuple. She'd do
> anything else, but tupling was out.
>
> Neil

that sounds like suss Sex to me. But without a tuple all is pointless!

--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/