"PitR" <> wrote in message
news: oups.com...
>
> JohnR66 wrote:
>> "PitR" <> wrote in message
>> news: oups.com...
>> > I've been reading and it seems that they're exactly the same camera
>> > (aside from firmware upgrades and a slightly bigger screen on the 70s,
>> > the former which you can update yourself)..
>> > According to this, anyway:
>> > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0504/05042003nikond70s.asp
>> >
>> > So, is the d70s worth that much more than the d70?
>> >
>> > I'm sure this has been talked about in the past.. I just want to know
>> > if anyone has first hand experience with both cameras that could shed
>> > the light I'm missing out on..
>> >
>> Go for the "s" version. The D70 had a color moire problem that could show
>> in
>> some situations. Nikon corrected the issue in the D50 and D70s.
>> John
>
>
> Well sure, the D70s is an updated camera, but are these updates worth
> $1000 more?
More like $200. If you already have a D70, the answer must be no. As the
D70 is no longer available new, anyone buying a new camera has no choice.
> I'm sure the D200 is a better camera with features that the D70s
> doesn't have, but this doesn't mean that these features will affect the
> way my pictures will result.
>
The D200 would definitely improve mine, but I am waiting on the replacement
for the D200 because it really isn't cost effective to replace cameras every
time a new model comes out.
Jim