«

After using the new Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8 VR for almost two weeks and
pitting it against the tried and true classic Micro Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D I
came to the following conclusions. For me, I like both equally well and
would never part with either one.

From an optical standpoint I'm not 100% convinced yet that the newer VR is
any better. I can see slightly better bokeh in the newer one in certain
situations, but this is highly subjective on my part. The AF on the new VR
version is awesome and lightning fast compared to the older model. This is
great since the 105mm f/2.8D Micro would take a bit more time "hunting" in
some circumstances. The VR works great at longer distances and diminishes on
close macro shots, which is to be expected. For close-ups and macros the AF
on the new model is much better and quickly locks in. For all my close-up
macro shots I use manual focus so either lens is equally suited to the task.

And if you are wondering how the AF performs on this lens with the TC-20E
II, it does work OK. The speed is a bit slower, which we expected anyway.
And surprisingly the AF does function on this combination up to f/9. If I
get a real close focus it will stop at f/9 and not recover. The AF is
basically working as it should and will recover up to f/8. So, don't be
afraid to use a TC with this lens since the only time you'll experience this
problem is when the subject is about 6" in front of the lens.

As for having to do it over again, that's a real tough call since both
lenses are magnificent and either one won't disappoint you. If you shoot a
lot of portraiture than the newer VR version is slightly better with bokeh
(subjective) and the AF is quicker. Really, other than that it really boils
down to your shooting style. If your needs are for a lens for really close
up macros and nothing more I would consider a mint condition used 105mm
f/2.8D Micro on the market for an exceptional price and I would recommend
going that route instead of the latest and greatest. The bottom line if you
are starting out new in macro I would suggest you go with what you can
afford.





Rita

"Rita Ä Berkowitz" <ritaberk2O04 @aol.com> wrote in message
news:...
[ . . . ]

Good and interesting write-up, Rita.

Both lenses are, of course, eBay approved?

Neil

Neil Harrington wrote:

> Good and interesting write-up, Rita.

Thanks.

> Both lenses are, of course, eBay approved?

The new VR version has of yet been officially tested and certified for
taking eBay auction pics. I don't foresee any problems with it making the
grade, but you never know. When in doubt, fall back to the older Micro
Nikkor 105mm f/2.8D for compliance with eBay's strict requirements.







Rita

In article <>,
Rita Ä Berkowitz <ritaberk2O04 @aol.com> wrote:

> As for having to do it over again, that's a real tough call since both
> lenses are magnificent and either one won't disappoint you. If you shoot a
> lot of portraiture than the newer VR version is slightly better with bokeh
> (subjective) and the AF is quicker. Really, other than that it really boils
> down to your shooting style. If your needs are for a lens for really close
> up macros and nothing more I would consider a mint condition used 105mm
> f/2.8D Micro on the market for an exceptional price and I would recommend
> going that route instead of the latest and greatest. The bottom line if you
> are starting out new in macro I would suggest you go with what you can
> afford.
>
>
>
>
>
> Rita

Thanks for the great analysis.

I bought the older model at a really great price.

My thinking was that since much of my micro work is done on a tripod, I
didn't need the VR. And, on a lot of it I use manual focus to pull final
focus.

I really love the lens.

sjh