>I came across an example the other day where someone who
>did not know about the four ways .NET and IIS provide for
>authenticated pages in ASP.NET, set up his own
>authentication scheme including his own encryption
>routines like those used by Julius Caesar.
>
>This individual has delivered quite a few bloopers over
>time. You know the kind I am talking about, not so much
>slapstick as slipslop.
Yet companies continue tolerate it - mad.
>The other problem is that the employers mostly don't
>appreciate the difference certification can make. In fact
>most are probably unaware that there is such a thing as an
>MCSD.NET. They advertise for people with twelve months
>proven commercial experience. I wonder just how many years
>it will take for my friend above to learn the four ways of
>doing Authentication.
The problem is that Microsoft certification process has been
undermined over the past four or five years. People can buy the
questions and answers or just search the multitude of braindumps out
there. In a nutshell, the certifications do not prove the holder has
an in depth understanding of the topics let alone how to work with the
products int he real world. This is great shame to vast majority of
people who undertake the certification process, seeking to prove, as
well as, improve their own ability.
>Question: how can we market ourselves better to overcome
>this problem?
The attitude of business towards IT has changed a great deal over the
past four years. However, you would have thought more companies would
require more from their employees in terms of them being able to prove
themselves. Yet companies still choose the people with the lowest
salary expectation.
>Question: should we petition Microsoft to spend more money
>promoting the value of .NET certification to those that
>hire?
Would they listen or even care?
|