![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
MCSD - Re: VB vs. C# Track - A SURVEY TO FIND OUT!!! |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
If I had a dollar for every fool who ran out and claimed
that VB is a better language than C#, I'd have my MCSD paid for in full. And if you want to get into a better syntax battle maybe you can have a go with the VFP guys. I personaly think that C# is a better language than VB, therefor I write in it. If you feel that a fast debuger is a feature... I think you spend too much time debuging. George Prado Concessive Technologies, Inc. "French is the language of love, for every thing else there's C#" >-----Original Message----- >A lot more people are taking C# route. Why is that? VB has a lot of useful >syntax that C# does not. > >1) declarative event handling >2) single method implementing multiple interface functions >3) property with parameters >4) when clause for catch blocks >5) imports is more powerful than using because imports includes not only >classes of a namespace but also namespaces of that namespace. >6) optional parameters. This is very useful in declaring multiple versions >of constructors >7) C# compiles to smaller MSIL but have you try vb in debugging mode? I feel >VB code starts up a lot quicker in debugging mode than C#. > >Vu Dang > > >. > George Prado |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
You call every one who do not share your view of the world a fool.
"George Prado" <> wrote in message news:17ae01c33df8$0d104660$... > If I had a dollar for every fool who ran out and claimed > that VB is a better language than C#, I'd have my MCSD > paid for in full. And if you want to get into a better > syntax battle maybe you can have a go with the VFP guys. > I personaly think that C# is a better language than VB, > therefor I write in it. If you feel that a fast debuger > is a feature... I think you spend too much time debuging. > > George Prado > Concessive Technologies, Inc. > "French is the language of love, for every thing else > there's C#" > > >-----Original Message----- > >A lot more people are taking C# route. Why is that? VB > has a lot of useful > >syntax that C# does not. > > > >1) declarative event handling > >2) single method implementing multiple interface > functions > >3) property with parameters > >4) when clause for catch blocks > >5) imports is more powerful than using because imports > includes not only > >classes of a namespace but also namespaces of that > namespace. > >6) optional parameters. This is very useful in > declaring multiple versions > >of constructors > >7) C# compiles to smaller MSIL but have you try vb in > debugging mode? I feel > >VB code starts up a lot quicker in debugging mode than > C#. > > > >Vu Dang > > > > > >. > > Vu Dang |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can you spare 10 minutes to do a survey? You can be a valuable help to university researchers! | daniel | DVD Video | 0 | 03-02-2007 02:19 AM |
| Your opinion matters: Online academic survey ($10 reward possible) | Justine | DVD Video | 1 | 03-22-2006 05:32 AM |
| new Star Trek-TOS still doesn't have original mono track if | Waterperson77 | DVD Video | 17 | 07-01-2004 06:12 PM |
| assign Next Track in DVD Studio Pro 1.5 | Billy Dechand | DVD Video | 0 | 12-07-2003 11:30 PM |
| Re: Roger Avary's Commentary Track on Day of Dead | Joseph S. Powell, III | DVD Video | 0 | 09-04-2003 11:14 PM |