"Ed Ruf" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On 25 Apr 2006 12:44:15 -0500, in rec.photo.digital David Dyer-Bennet
> <dd-> wrote:
>
>>"John Falstaff" <> writes:
>>
>>> "Hans S" <> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns97B0A286824E0lavachequirit@194.109.133.242 ...
>>> > John Falstaff wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I understand Nikon Capture can convert the fisheye image from the
>>> >> 10.5mm
>>> >> lens into a rectilinear one, but what focal length rectilinear lens
>>> >> does
>>> >> that become equal to?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > 10.5 mm
>>>
>>> Okay, I'll rephrase the question.
>>>
>>> What focal length rectilinear lens does that become equal to IN FIELD OF
>>> VIEW, CORNER TO CORNER?
>>
>>After cropping to a rectangle.
>
>
> According to :
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_fish.html
>
> 120 degrees.
Thank you!!
Wider than a 14mm lens on a 35, then. So Hans S was apparently right, and I
thought he was putting me on.
My abject apologies, Hans.
But now that 120 degrees looks wrong. I can see that Hans is right, a 10.5mm
fisheye "converts" to a 10.5mm rectilinear because the central part of the
image still has the same magnification and the corners are just stretched
out to suit. I should've thought of that in the first place.
But with the 1.5x focal length factor, that means equivalent to just under
16mm rectilinear on a 35, which wouldn't cover 120 degrees corner to corner.
A 14mm lens on a 35 covers only about 114 degrees. A 17mm covers about 104.
So somewhere between those two.