On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:02:23 GMT, Mardon <> wrote:
>Hi to everyone who has been following the 2 previous threads
>discussing my questions about techniques for photographing hockey.
>
>As promised, I've created a web page for the photos from my second
>attempt at covering a hockey game. On this occasion, I actually
>focused more on the pre-game and off-ice events because the Olympic
>Gold Medal winning curling rink of "Team Gushue" was there. I wanted
>to be sure to cover them and the opening ceremonies. As always,
>comments welcome.
>
>Here's the URL:
>http://www.JustPhotos.ca/oldphotos/sports/FD060304.htm
>
>Mardon
Mardon,
I won't go into too much detail about your technical
photographic skills aside to say that they are very good, as is your
timing. The reason for not going into more technical detail is
because I am sure there are far more qualified photographers out there
who can contribute much more helpful feedback.
What I was impressed with in both your 1st & 2nd Hokey photo
shoots was the diversity of what you covered. Often "Pros" just
concentrate on a given style of photography that works for them, such
as high angle shoots to exclude the spectators from the shot or maybe
player level shots with narrow DOF to keep both background &
foreground intentionally out of focus.
As a very accomplished writer once told an aspiring writer who
wished to learn more about him, (to the best of my recall) "you need
only read my books, who I am is pretty much there!". If I apply this
to your photography, it's seems you have the wisdom to both see &
photograph the big picture, not just what's on the ice but a bit of
everything that is required to make the on-ice action possible.
The posed picture of the red rested workers who help in many
ways, the behind the scene preparations (even the Pepsi girls), the
children, mascot on the sidelines & etc.
Also 1 last note, according to a feedback post @ B&H by an
individual who has used the new 30D, he claims that there will be a
firmware hack out soon to add the 3.5 degree spot metering function to
20D cameras. If true this may be of interest to you or others with
the 20D. As for me, I will be upgrading only because I am doing so
from the humble 300D, so for me there are considerable reasons to
justify the upgrade but if I had a 20D, I'd wait & evaluate the next
offering.
Anyway thanks for sharing your work with us, it will help me
to see the settings that work for the 20D because the 30D is basically
the same beast aside from a the larger LCD & a few mainly firmware
upgrades.
For the record I have 26+ years in film & 6+ years in digital
photography but I will always consider myself an amateur because I
have never charged for my photographic contributions & for a
semi-selfish reason. The moment I charge for what I do as a hobby, is
when I suspect that it will begin to feel like work & some of the joy
will be lost. I have photographed weddings as a additional
photographer & simply copied all of the picture onto CD's for the
couple to do with as they please. This makes me happy in much the
same manner that giving away some of your work does for you.
Best of luck with your photography hobby, you are much better
than you may think or your a truly humble individual or both!
Respectfully, DHB
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918