«

Samsung Electronics announced that it has developed a 1.72-inch
super-reflective (SR) LCD screen that can be read easily outdoors even
when the sun is shining brightly. The reflectance rate for the new
transflective SR LCD technology is three times that of the usual
qqVGA-resolution (128x160 pixels) mobile displays available today.

Samsung Electronics has applied silver with high reflectance instead
of aluminum to achieve the breakthrough. At the same time, the company
developed a new reflective lens that greatly improves the rate at
which light is concentrated into pixels. In addition, light entering
the 1.72” LCD can be fully harnessed due to improved transmittance
capabilities of the polarizer and color filter.

Moreover, to prevent any increase in power consumption, Samsung chose
to combine the super-reflectance technology with transflective
(illuminated the screen from front and back) rather than transmissive
(illuminated from behind the screen) panel technology. The
transflective mode makes more effective use of natural outside
lighting than the transmissive mode, while the transmissive mode
instead would have increased power consumption by requiring a
brightness of at least 300nit to sufficiently improve outdoor
visibility.

The super-reflective 1.72” LCD has a brightness of 100nit, a contrast
ratio of 220:1/30:1 (transmission/reflection) and 50 percent color
saturation.

Executive Vice President Jin-hyuk Yun of the Mobile Display Business
Team at Samsung Electronics LCD Business says, “Our new
super-reflectance technology allows us to offer consumers a
high-quality LCD that is very easy to read in bright sunlight. The SR
technology has improved the reflecting metal, the color filter and
other parts of the assembled LCD module, in addition to the lens and
reflectance rate, without increasing production costs or lowering
yields.”

Samsung Electronics plans to apply its new SR technology to all its
high-resolution transflective displays in phases.

Source: Samsung Electronics

"Rich" <> wrote in message
news:...

Its has no apostrophe.
I've told you this before.
Why don't you listen?

Helen wrote:

> "Rich" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
> Its has no apostrophe.
> I've told you this before.
> Why don't you listen?

There'll be no answer to that one, I'll wager.

Now, lemme see, where's that special sig line.....

--
John McWilliams

In additon to it's, we can have hi's, her's and their's!!!

Help stamp out repetition, gratuitous apostrophe's, and NEEDLESS',
redundant, and WHOLLY UNNECESSARY CAPITALIZATION, **AND**superflous
*EMPHASIS*. And tautological statements which waste space and can be
repetitive or even wordy in and of temselves', thus taking more time to
read, or even think about; it's tedious and enervating.

These are *THE* internet *SCOURGES'*, along with exclamation points!!!

And sig line monitorz.... I know this is long. Very long.

"Helen" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "Rich" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
> Its has no apostrophe.
> I've told you this before.
> Why don't you listen?
>
He seems to have problem with its and it is (it's) I can't figure out why he
is saying;

This could find it is way

The other one that bugs me is the word looser, used instead of loser.

"Darrell Larose" <> wrote in message
news:43e632b4$0$8269$.. .
>
> "Helen" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>> "Rich" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>
>> Its has no apostrophe.
>> I've told you this before.
>> Why don't you listen?
>>
> He seems to have problem with its and it is (it's) I can't figure out why he
> is saying;
>
> This could find it is way
>
> The other one that bugs me is the word looser, used instead of loser.
>
>
>
>


Definatly!

In news:43e632b4$0$8269$,
Darrell Larose typed...
>
> The other one that bugs me is the word looser, used instead of loser.

Than, instead of then -- to, instead of too.
"Should of", instead of "should have", or "should've".

The list is endless.

--
Bri.

Helen wrote:
> "Rich" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
> Its has no apostrophe.
> I've told you this before.
> Why don't you listen?

http://www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk/

Bri. wrote:
> In news:43e632b4$0$8269$,
> Darrell Larose typed...
>>
>> The other one that bugs me is the word looser, used instead of
>> loser.
>
> Than, instead of then -- to, instead of too.
> "Should of", instead of "should have", or "should've".
>
> The list is endless.

If I should be more often
disappointed by
"Then" for 'Than" than
"Than" for "Then", then
"Then" For "Than" might
be more common
Than "Than" for "Then"
Or even "That" for "Than"

Don't get me started on
"Different than..."

"Begs the question"=
"Have you stopped misusing language?"

"There is 'a rat' in 'separate'."
-- 'Struth

"All of philosophy consists of unlocking, exhuming,
and recanting what's been said before,
and then getting riled up about it."
—V.S. Ramachandran—

"Darrell Larose" <> wrote in message
news:43e632b4$0$8269$.. .
>
>>
> He seems to have problem with its and it is (it's) I can't figure out why
> he is saying;
>
> This could find it is way
>
> The other one that bugs me is the word looser, used instead of loser.
>

There's alot of spelling a lot, and other pairs of words, as single words
and that worries me alot.
Thankyou. Have a niceday.

Helen
Aphotographer

In terms of the subject it does not really matter.