Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Fuji FinePix S9000 9 Mega Pixel Camera Came Out 17 Mega Pixel?

Reply
Thread Tools

Fuji FinePix S9000 9 Mega Pixel Camera Came Out 17 Mega Pixel?

 
 
WannabeSomeone
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005
I found that my Fuji FinePix S9000's output RAW file (.RAF) is 19,139,712
bytes. When the same photo is converter to TIFF (.TIF) by the accompanied
software (FinePix Viewer), it becomes 53,321,728 bytes, and Windows
indicates it has a resolution of 4864x3648. That will be 17,743,872 pixels.
After conversion to JPEG by Adobe PhotoShop Elements 4.0, Windows still
indicates the resulting JPEG file is 4864x3648.

Then I tried to shoot in JPEG 9 Mega Pixel Fine mode. The resulting file
shows 3488x2616 (9,124,608 pixels) just like the specifications of the
manual claimed.

Can anybody explain the above phenomenon I can get 17 mega pixel using RAW
mode?



Best Regards,

Wannabe
=======

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
~~NoMad~~
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005
Looks like some Technician at the factory substituted one of the FinePix
S18000 sensors in your camera!

NM



"WannabeSomeone" <> wrote in message
news:yk0ef.925$...
>I found that my Fuji FinePix S9000's output RAW file (.RAF) is 19,139,712
>bytes. When the same photo is converter to TIFF (.TIF) by the accompanied
>software (FinePix Viewer), it becomes 53,321,728 bytes, and Windows
>indicates it has a resolution of 4864x3648. That will be 17,743,872 pixels.
>After conversion to JPEG by Adobe PhotoShop Elements 4.0, Windows still
>indicates the resulting JPEG file is 4864x3648.
>
> Then I tried to shoot in JPEG 9 Mega Pixel Fine mode. The resulting file
> shows 3488x2616 (9,124,608 pixels) just like the specifications of the
> manual claimed.
>
> Can anybody explain the above phenomenon I can get 17 mega pixel using RAW
> mode?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Wannabe
> =======



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Matalog
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005
No, I read a review somewhere that this is what happens on them all - search
in google (that's how I came across it) I don't remember what it said.






"~~NoMad~~" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Looks like some Technician at the factory substituted one of the FinePix
> S18000 sensors in your camera!
>
> NM
>
>
>
> "WannabeSomeone" <> wrote in message
> news:yk0ef.925$...
> >I found that my Fuji FinePix S9000's output RAW file (.RAF) is 19,139,712
> >bytes. When the same photo is converter to TIFF (.TIF) by the accompanied
> >software (FinePix Viewer), it becomes 53,321,728 bytes, and Windows
> >indicates it has a resolution of 4864x3648. That will be 17,743,872

pixels.
> >After conversion to JPEG by Adobe PhotoShop Elements 4.0, Windows still
> >indicates the resulting JPEG file is 4864x3648.
> >
> > Then I tried to shoot in JPEG 9 Mega Pixel Fine mode. The resulting file
> > shows 3488x2616 (9,124,608 pixels) just like the specifications of the
> > manual claimed.
> >
> > Can anybody explain the above phenomenon I can get 17 mega pixel using

RAW
> > mode?
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Wannabe
> > =======

>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Matalog
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fuji...000/page14.asp










"WannabeSomeone" <> wrote in message
news:yk0ef.925$...
> I found that my Fuji FinePix S9000's output RAW file (.RAF) is 19,139,712
> bytes. When the same photo is converter to TIFF (.TIF) by the accompanied
> software (FinePix Viewer), it becomes 53,321,728 bytes, and Windows
> indicates it has a resolution of 4864x3648. That will be 17,743,872

pixels.
> After conversion to JPEG by Adobe PhotoShop Elements 4.0, Windows still
> indicates the resulting JPEG file is 4864x3648.
>
> Then I tried to shoot in JPEG 9 Mega Pixel Fine mode. The resulting file
> shows 3488x2616 (9,124,608 pixels) just like the specifications of the
> manual claimed.
>
> Can anybody explain the above phenomenon I can get 17 mega pixel using RAW
> mode?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Wannabe
> =======
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
WannabeSomeone
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005

"~~NoMad~~" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Looks like some Technician at the factory substituted one of the FinePix
> S18000 sensors in your camera!
>
> NM
>



I don't think a wrong sensor can work in a different model. It will be nice
if it is the case. I'll run out and buy a few more before they found out.


Wannabe
=======

 
Reply With Quote
 
WannabeSomeone
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-14-2005

"Matalog" <> wrote in message
news:m13ef.5626$...


> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fuji...000/page14.asp

In addition to the standard file browsing software (FinePix Viewer),
Fujifilm supplies only the most basic raw conversion software with the
S9000. Raw File Converter LE offers no control over the conversion process,
simply spitting an 8-bit TIFF file out the other end. Interestingly no one
seems to have told Fuji's software group that they don't double the
resolution of Super CCD files any more, as Raw Converter LE spits out
immense 4864 x 3468 pixel, 17 megapixel TIFFs, each of which weighs in at
just over 50MB.




I checked the link above. That explains why I am getting 17 meg out of a 9
meg camera.

The TIFF file size is 3 times the 17 meg resolution. That means the TIFF is
using 3 bytes for each pixel, or 8 bits for each color of the RGB.

My PhotoShop Elements 4.0 cannot read the CCD-RAW file (.RAF). I may have to
wait for the updates.


Thanks for the link.


Wannabe
=======

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Digital Camera Review at XYZ Computing Silverstrand Front Page News 0 02-05-2006 03:10 AM
Fuji Finepix S9500 (S9000) sample photos Graham Archer Digital Photography 3 09-12-2005 01:34 PM
Any photos with the Fuji Finepix S9500 (or S9000)? Graham Archer Digital Photography 1 09-08-2005 11:50 AM
Panasonic Lumix FZ30 V Fuji Finepix S9500 (S9000) Graham Archer Digital Photography 22 09-06-2005 11:11 AM
Re: Canon G3 vs Olympus camedia 5050 Vs Fuji Fuji FinePix Digital Camera, S602 Chris Gunn Digital Photography 2 07-14-2003 01:03 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57