Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Canon 5D???

Reply
Thread Tools

Canon 5D???

 
 
GTO
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
I am probably a few days behind on this one. But how real is the Canon 5D?
See http://news.techwhack.com/1878/canon...ally-unveiled/

A full-format CMOS chip with 13 MPixels for around US$3500, doesn't sound
bad at all.

Gregor


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mark˛
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005

"GTO" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
newswULe.634$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>I am probably a few days behind on this one. But how real is the Canon 5D?
>See http://news.techwhack.com/1878/canon...ally-unveiled/
>
> A full-format CMOS chip with 13 MPixels for around US$3500, doesn't sound
> bad at all.
>
> Gregor


Search the forum, and you'll find extensive discussion of this topic within
the last several days.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
GTO
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come later
this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a larger
screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.

Gregor


"Mark˛" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
news:UDULe.1066$ct5.148@fed1read04...
>
> "GTO" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> newswULe.634$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>>I am probably a few days behind on this one. But how real is the Canon 5D?
>>See http://news.techwhack.com/1878/canon...ally-unveiled/
>>
>> A full-format CMOS chip with 13 MPixels for around US$3500, doesn't sound
>> bad at all.
>>
>> Gregor

>
> Search the forum, and you'll find extensive discussion of this topic
> within the last several days.
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Mr. Mark
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
> Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come later
> this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a larger
> screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.


FWIW, Nikon seems to be competing on something other than megapixels. I had
the chance to shoot a friend's D70 and was quite impressed. Of course I
then went out and bought a 20D.

--
Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark˛
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005

"Mr. Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:X1VLe.16271$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>> Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come
>> later
>> this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a
>> larger
>> screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.

>
> FWIW, Nikon seems to be competing on something other than megapixels. I
> had
> the chance to shoot a friend's D70 and was quite impressed. Of course I
> then went out and bought a 20D.
>
> --
> Mark


Not sure I follow your comment. It seems to imply that they've captured
some other mystical quality, and yet you passed it over for the 20D. ??

I don't think the 5D qualifies so much as a "pixel competition" camera as
much as it is a breakthrough in full-frame availablity. This will mark the
beginning of wide-spread appeal for true wide-angle coverage--with DSLRS
that more people can afford. Granted, it's still quite expensive, if
predictions are right, but it's a move inthe right direction. Personally, I
think Nikon has missed a significant boat by ignoring the full-frame issue.
Wide angle enthsiasts who are invested in top optics will be mighty glad to
see this from Canon. I recently mounted my Canon 16-35 2.8 L lens on my EOS
3 film body...and BOING--I had almost forgotten what TRUE wide angle
as! -On my 10D, that 16 doesn't look very wide by comparison. Come on
Nikon! Get in the game and compete! I don't like paying Canon prices when
there's no competetive alternative.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Neil Ellwood
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:58:32 -0700, Mark˛ wrote:

>
> "Mr. Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:X1VLe.16271$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>>> Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come
>>> later
>>> this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a
>>> larger
>>> screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.

>>
>> FWIW, Nikon seems to be competing on something other than megapixels. I
>> had
>> the chance to shoot a friend's D70 and was quite impressed. Of course I
>> then went out and bought a 20D.
>>
>> --
>> Mark

>
> Not sure I follow your comment. It seems to imply that they've captured
> some other mystical quality, and yet you passed it over for the 20D. ??
>
> I don't think the 5D qualifies so much as a "pixel competition" camera as
> much as it is a breakthrough in full-frame availablity. This will mark the
> beginning of wide-spread appeal for true wide-angle coverage--with DSLRS
> that more people can afford. Granted, it's still quite expensive, if
> predictions are right, but it's a move inthe right direction. Personally, I
> think Nikon has missed a significant boat by ignoring the full-frame issue.
> Wide angle enthsiasts who are invested in top optics will be mighty glad to
> see this from Canon. I recently mounted my Canon 16-35 2.8 L lens on my EOS
> 3 film body...and BOING--I had almost forgotten what TRUE wide angle
> as! -On my 10D, that 16 doesn't look very wide by comparison. Come on
> Nikon! Get in the game and compete! I don't like paying Canon prices when
> there's no competetive alternative.

Contax never ignored the full frame sensor and look what happened to them.

--
Neil
Delete delete to reply by email
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark˛
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005

"Neil Ellwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed) m...
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:58:32 -0700, Mark˛ wrote:
>
>>
>> "Mr. Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:X1VLe.16271$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>>>> Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come
>>>> later
>>>> this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a
>>>> larger
>>>> screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.
>>>
>>> FWIW, Nikon seems to be competing on something other than megapixels. I
>>> had
>>> the chance to shoot a friend's D70 and was quite impressed. Of course I
>>> then went out and bought a 20D.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark

>>
>> Not sure I follow your comment. It seems to imply that they've captured
>> some other mystical quality, and yet you passed it over for the 20D.
>> ??
>>
>> I don't think the 5D qualifies so much as a "pixel competition" camera as
>> much as it is a breakthrough in full-frame availablity. This will mark
>> the
>> beginning of wide-spread appeal for true wide-angle coverage--with DSLRS
>> that more people can afford. Granted, it's still quite expensive, if
>> predictions are right, but it's a move inthe right direction.
>> Personally, I
>> think Nikon has missed a significant boat by ignoring the full-frame
>> issue.
>> Wide angle enthsiasts who are invested in top optics will be mighty glad
>> to
>> see this from Canon. I recently mounted my Canon 16-35 2.8 L lens on my
>> EOS
>> 3 film body...and BOING--I had almost forgotten what TRUE wide angle
>> as! -On my 10D, that 16 doesn't look very wide by comparison. Come on
>> Nikon! Get in the game and compete! I don't like paying Canon prices
>> when
>> there's no competetive alternative.

> Contax never ignored the full frame sensor and look what happened to them.


No, they just ignored teh fact that they had nearly no market or lens-owner
base...meaning teh masses couldn't utilize their body without starting from
scratch. Canon and Nikon both had hoards of people who already owned lenses
they could use on an expensive body. Contax had a good reputation with some
in the know...but they had the worst with the masses...that being **no**
reputation. If you took a survery of camera brands people were aware of,
Contax would have been WAY down the list for all but people like you and me.

Oh... And they also forgot to make a DSLR that worked.

That always helps.


 
Reply With Quote
 
David J. Littleboy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005

"Neil Ellwood" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Contax never ignored the full frame sensor and look what happened to them.


The Contax FF dSLR was a 6MP camera with an insane price tag and uninspired
performance.

Heck, even the original 1Ds was problematic, with its inadequate low-pass
filter (nasty Moiré) and poor noise performance compared to the 10D.

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan



 
Reply With Quote
 
Joseph Meehan
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
Mark˛ wrote:
> "Mr. Mark" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:X1VLe.16271$(E-Mail Removed). ..
>>> Found it. Thanks. - So, then we'll soon see some nice new model come
>>> later
>>> this month. I wonder what Nikon's response will be. - A D2Xs with a
>>> larger
>>> screen and an improved battery, perhaps? - Just kidding.

>>
>> FWIW, Nikon seems to be competing on something other than
>> megapixels. I had
>> the chance to shoot a friend's D70 and was quite impressed. Of
>> course I then went out and bought a 20D.
>>
>> --
>> Mark

>
> Not sure I follow your comment. It seems to imply that they've
> captured some other mystical quality, and yet you passed it over for
> the 20D. ??
> I don't think the 5D qualifies so much as a "pixel competition"
> camera as much as it is a breakthrough in full-frame availablity. This
> will mark the beginning of wide-spread appeal for true
> wide-angle coverage--with DSLRS that more people can afford. Granted,
> it's still quite expensive, if predictions are right, but it's a move
> inthe right direction. Personally, I think Nikon has missed a
> significant boat by ignoring the full-frame issue. Wide angle
> enthsiasts who are invested in top optics will be mighty glad to see
> this from Canon. I recently mounted my Canon 16-35 2.8 L lens on my
> EOS 3 film body...and BOING--I had almost forgotten what TRUE wide
> angle as! -On my 10D, that 16 doesn't look very wide by comparison.


It may not be what you need but the 10-22mm does a great job for me.
Frankly I doubt if I would have bought the 20D if it were not available.

> Come
> on Nikon! Get in the game and compete! I don't like paying Canon
> prices when there's no competetive alternative.


--
Joseph Meehan

Dia duit


 
Reply With Quote
 
winhag@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-15-2005
Agreed (10-22 availability). But, that means that the 20D really costs
>$2k if it forces you to buy an $800 lens (assuming you already had wide angle glass).


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon should be totally ashamed of this (and some others too) HP got this basic and absolutely essential thing right in their little digicam that's cheap even for a P&S, so why can't Canon?!! Yes, I know, there's more to the Canon 20D, b Mike Henley Digital Photography 43 12-15-2004 05:21 PM
Difference between Canon G5 and Canon S50 zxcvar Digital Photography 6 07-23-2003 09:47 AM
APS Canon IXUS versus digital Canon IXUS ( a question for the pros ) Davidgilmour2003@hotmail.com Digital Photography 4 07-20-2003 05:48 AM
Canon ixus 400 or canon ixus 2 ? David J. Gilmour Digital Photography 7 07-20-2003 12:00 AM
reading compact flash on different camera than used to take photos (canon to canon) Jim Digital Photography 0 07-15-2003 08:13 PM



Advertisments