The advise about shooting RAW is good. The problem is more than just
metering. It may not be possible to get the extremes of a high contrast
scene to fit within the range of the camera. RAW gives you a bit more
range...but even then it may not be enough. If you don't have your tripod
you can set up your camera to shoot a burst of bracketed shots and if you
are lucky they will line up.
--
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at
http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group
www.route611.com & Route 611 Magazine
"Deepak" <> wrote in message
news: ups.com...
> All,
>
> I have for a quite sometime struggled to get correct and pleasing
> exposures especially in high contrast scenes.I use the built in meter
> on the Canon 20D.
>
> For eg:If I am shooting a landscape which includes a bright blue sky
> with clouds,a foreground (tree),I either blow up the sky or kill the
> tree in shadows.I do understand that we need to correctly meter against
> these.I am able shoot different exposures and 'blend' them in
> photoshop.BUT its tough for me to beleive that is the only way to do
> that.
>
> Can I walk away with a very evenly exposed Landscape shot 'in the
> camera' ?
>
> Having to take multiple exposures entails having your tripod with
> you.There are time when I 'dont' have it with me and multiple
> exposures+blending would not work isnt it?
>
> I am wondering how you guys deal with this.I realise this is among the
> first hurdled most photographers deal with.It would great to know how
> you guys get there evntually
>
> BTW I do understand the role of aperture+shutter speed+ISO and their
> interdependancies in the context of landscape photography.What I am
> really looking for is clues for metering correctly.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Deepak
>