Welcome to the world of ETT-L II. There is a constant undercurrent of
grumping from 20D owners, and some Rebel and 1D mkII owners, too, about
consistent underexposure with either the built in flash or Canon own branded
flashes. There are two solutions, or actually three. Shoot in manual,
using a shoe mounted flash, shoot with your Flash Exposure Compensation
dialed up somewhere between 1 1/3 and 2 stops, or use an non-Canon flash.
My wife and I get abysmal results with Canon flashes ( I won't go into the
details, but the flash defaults to fill with any ambient light at all) and
excellent results with Quantums, which, unfortunately run about $1000 for a
flash set up. But I've heard of others getting excellent results from
Sunpak, Vivitar and Metz flashes, which run somewhere between $150 and $350,
depending on flash power.
BTW, avoid the "Basic" modes, they cripple the camera too much. If you want
the camera to do your thinking for you, use the "program" mode over on the
"Creative" side of the command dial. There, you have options for metering
and exposure, not to mention expanded parameters and custom functions, not
available on the "Basic" modes.
--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
"Marge" <> wrote in message
news:Nc-dnenCnM6KMeffRVn-...
> Hi:
>
> I have a Canon 20D with the 18-55mm lens that was supplied with the
> camera.
>
> When taking pictures at family birthday parties and gatherings in a living
> room and dining room my pictures come out very dark. The lighting is dim
> but
> adequate with overhead lighting and table lamps. All the shooting is done
> in
> the Basic Zone Modes where everything is set automatically. To quote from
> the manual "You just press the shutter button, and the camera does the
> rest"
> .
>
> You certainly cannot print directly from the memory card however, which is
> want I want to do. Every picture has to be processed to increase the
> brightness. I've taken pictures in the same surroundings before with a
> $50.00 digital camera and the pictures come out bright enough to print
> without any processing.
>
> This is not a simple camera but at these affairs I'm using it as a point
> and
> shoot. I take about one hundred pictures and I don't want to spend hours
> processing them.
>
> My question is whether it's me or the camera? I would appreciate feedback
> from anyone who has experienced this.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
>
>
>
>