Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > DSLR shutter lag comparisons

Reply
Thread Tools

DSLR shutter lag comparisons

 
 
Bill Tuthill
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-11-2005
Thanks to Imaging-resource.com, here are the autofocus speeds
and prefocus (half-press shutter) timings for prosumer DSLRs.
Pentax *istDS and Canon 350D not yet tested.

AF * half-press
Canon 20D 0.155 0.077
Pentax istD 0.230 0.130
Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117
Canon 300D 0.264 0.142
Nikon D70 0.414 0.124

* Given in seconds and sorted by double-weighted AF times.
Averaged when times varied from wide-angle to telephoto.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Dave R knows who
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-11-2005
I would only trust the full-manual times. You didn't say if it was M, S, or
A mode.

And no, I'm not a Nikon user: Own a 1D and 300D.


"Bill Tuthill" <> wrote in message news:...
> Thanks to Imaging-resource.com, here are the autofocus speeds
> and prefocus (half-press shutter) timings for prosumer DSLRs.
> Pentax *istDS and Canon 350D not yet tested.
>
> AF * half-press
> Canon 20D 0.155 0.077
> Pentax istD 0.230 0.130
> Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117
> Canon 300D 0.264 0.142
> Nikon D70 0.414 0.124
>
> * Given in seconds and sorted by double-weighted AF times.
> Averaged when times varied from wide-angle to telephoto.
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jim Townsend
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-11-2005
Bill Tuthill wrote:

> Thanks to Imaging-resource.com, here are the autofocus speeds
> and prefocus (half-press shutter) timings for prosumer DSLRs.
> Pentax *istDS and Canon 350D not yet tested.
>
> AF * half-press
> Canon 20D 0.155 0.077
> Pentax istD 0.230 0.130
> Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117
> Canon 300D 0.264 0.142
> Nikon D70 0.414 0.124
>
> * Given in seconds and sorted by double-weighted AF times.
> Averaged when times varied from wide-angle to telephoto.


These figures are nice, but it would also be nice to
know what lens was being use. I think the lens ultimately
decides how fast AF takes place.

For instance, a Canon USM lens will focus much faster
than a non USM lens.

Subject contrast and ambient light have a lot to do with
it as well.


 
Reply With Quote
 
eawckyegcy@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
Bill Tuthill wrote:

> AF * half-press
> Canon 20D 0.155 0.077
> Pentax istD 0.230 0.130
> Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117
> Canon 300D 0.264 0.142
> Nikon D70 0.414 0.124


Cordin 220 n/a 0.000000010

http://www.cordin.com

 
Reply With Quote
 
Scott W
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005

wrote:
> Bill Tuthill wrote:
>
> > AF * half-press
> > Canon 20D 0.155 0.077
> > Pentax istD 0.230 0.130
> > Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117
> > Canon 300D 0.264 0.142
> > Nikon D70 0.414 0.124

>
> Cordin 220 n/a 0.000000010
>
> http://www.cordin.com


Talk about filling up a flash card in a hurry.

Scott

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill Tuthill
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
Jim Townsend <> wrote:
>
> These figures are nice, but it would also be nice to
> know what lens was being use. I think the lens ultimately
> decides how fast AF takes place.


Usually it's using the small-circle lens that comes in kit form.
IIRC both the D20 and D300 were tested with 18-55/3.5-5.6 EFS.
Do you think the Nikon 18-70/3.5-4.5 DX is slow autofocusing?

> For instance, a Canon USM lens will focus much faster
> than a non USM lens.


This is not always true of short-focal range lenses, but is
almost always true of telephoto lenses. E.g. Nikon SLR cameras
regularly beat Canon SLR cameras in Chasseur d'Images testing
for the 50mm but not for the 70|80-200/2.8 at 200mm.

> Subject contrast and ambient light have a lot to do with
> it as well.


It's standardized, you can read about it at Imaging-resource.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Siddhartha Jain
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
Bill Tuthill wrote:
> Thanks to Imaging-resource.com, here are the autofocus speeds
> and prefocus (half-press shutter) timings for prosumer DSLRs.
> Pentax *istDS and Canon 350D not yet tested.


Could you post the link please? I tried looking up the site but
couldn't find the article.

Thanks,

Siddhartha

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill Tuthill
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
Dave R knows who <> wrote:
> I would only trust the full-manual times.


Why do you say this? For people like me who use autofocus a lot,
AF times are most important.

Can you tell me something about the Imaging-resource.com methodology
that I don't know? I can't find any explanation there.

> You didn't say if it was M, S, or A mode.


My suspicion is that the first column was P mode and the second column
was P mode with half shutter press.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bill Tuthill
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
Siddhartha Jain <> wrote:
>
> Could you post the link please? I tried looking up the site but
> couldn't find the article.


http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D70/D70A9.HTM
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E20D/E20DA8.HTM
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EDR/EDRA7.HTM
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/ISTD/ISTDA7.HTM
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/MAX7/D7A7.HTM

Here is the table updated with Canon 10D and manual focus.
The reason the Canon 10D outperformed the 20D in autofocus was
that it had 24-85/3.5-4.5 USM instead of 18-55/3.5-5.6 EFS,
which does not fit the 10D.

AF avg ½ press MF
Canon 20D 0.155 0.077 0.110
Canon 10D 0.146 0.104 0.146
Pentax *istD 0.230 0.130 0.180
Canon 300D 0.264 0.142 0.248
Minolta 7D 0.266 0.117 0.253
Nikon D70 0.414 0.124 0.155

Measurements for the Nikon might be amiss, because Dpreview.com
measured the D70 as a 2.9 fps camera (hence below .33) and wrote
"shutter release lag simply isn't there." The tested average
with the 18-70/3.5-4.5 DX ranged from 0.342-0.486. Maybe this
is just a slow AFing lens.

I'm not sure, but I think the K-M D7 was tested with 17-35/2.8-4
but it might have been 28-70/2.8 which is known to be slow AFing.
I think the Pentax was tested with 18-35/4-5.6 J.

To be fair, all models should be tested with Sigma 18-125 or
another lens that fits all mounts. Then each manufacturer should
get the opportunity to prove that USM or AFS could be faster.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Skip M
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-12-2005
"Bill Tuthill" <> wrote in message news:...
> Dave R knows who <> wrote:
>> I would only trust the full-manual times.

>
> Why do you say this? For people like me who use autofocus a lot,
> AF times are most important.
>


Probably because AF times can vary from one lens to another, and can vary
given distance to subject, too many variables.

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shutter lag: Sony 828 vs DSLR Jeremy Henderson Digital Photography 3 03-03-2004 05:59 PM
Re: Shutter Lag Paul Rubin Digital Photography 5 08-07-2003 07:20 PM
Re: Shutter Lag Juan R. Pollo Digital Photography 2 08-05-2003 07:23 PM
Re: Shutter Lag Dreamer Digital Photography 2 08-05-2003 03:54 PM
shutter time lag Spiderman Digital Photography 20 07-26-2003 08:33 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57