Thank you John and Mark:
I get false focus locks with camera set to full auto so I assume the
software will select the appropriate ISO rating for a particular shot. The
camera does lock focus, albeit on the background or the floor...with my EOS
all I have to do to get a guaranteed tack-sharp focus is to place the focus
sensor partially on some vertical element of the subject (side of a person's
head, sleeve, etc) and after a fraction of a second, Bam! I get a solid
focus lock. With the Pro 1, however, try the same method and it hunts and
hunts and Bam! The fence in the background or the the leading edge of the
counter top in the foreground is tack-sharp but not the subject. So I have
to recompose and start over again. By the time I get a good focus the
moment has usually passed.
Anyway, I am sure the camera is working per design and I just need to quit
comparing it to my 35mm. My biggest problem is that my wife is slowing
learning to hate the camera becasue she can't pick it up and take a shot. I
brought home the A85 from my office to take on a business trip and that $250
camera repetedly takes in-focus images with little or no fuss. Granted the
quality isn't as good as the Pro-1 but at least they're in focus.
"Mark Weaver" <> wrote in message
news:CLOdnXNfLKuLqkHcRVn-...
>
> "Scott" <> wrote in message
> news:AXLCd.6791$ ...
>> Thanks you for your reesponse Mark (and TAFKAB):
>>
>> The situations where I am frustrated by this camera seem to occur
>> (mostly)
>> indoors where below average lighting prevails. I have set the camera to
> use
>> 50 ASA in all modes except AUTO, where it choses whatever is appropriate.
>> If the ambient lighting indoors is too low to accurately focus then I
> guess
>> Canon should have included some type of AF assist lighting. My 10 year
> old
>> ELAN IIe with the 28-135 IS lens focuses in almost no lighting and very
>> quickly to boot...I guess I've only had the camera for a month and I
> should
>> give it more time. Do you have any advice or suggestiooons you can share
>> with regard to improving the focusing quality?
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>
> Well, I have to admit I do mostly outdoor photography, but the light has
> to
> get pretty low before the AF fails. Is the camera indicating a good focus
> lock even though it is off? Or is it failing to lock at all? I assume
> these flash photos? Otherwise ISO 50 in low light is going to require a
> tripod. BTW, I've had pretty good luck with ISO 200 and 400. They don't
> look great on screen at 100% (pixel-peeping) resolution, but they look
> quite
> good at lower resolution or in prints (especially with the use of noise
> reduction software).
>
> Mark
>
>
>
|