Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Reporter seeking info...

Reply
Thread Tools

Reporter seeking info...

 
 
AtticusF
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
Hey, gang:

I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.

I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
(memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
lacking in the specifics.

What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
mean.

My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.

If emailing directly, use .

Thanks so much!

Atticus Fisher
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
David J Taylor
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
AtticusF wrote:
[]
> What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
> factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
> down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
> technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
> the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
> mean.


1 - by what they want to achieve, and how much they are prepared to pay:

e.g. subjects: family snap-shots, children, sports events, close-ups,
safari holiday, architecture. Photos for: direct printing, putting on the
Web, e-mailing to friends, display on TV etc?

The suitable camera types follow from that, but one so often hears
requests for advice where you can't give a sensible answer as you don't
know what someone is trying to do.


2 - sites like:

http://www.dpreview.com/

http://www.steves-digicams.com/

Cheers,
David


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Charles
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
On 3 Nov 2004 08:58:00 -0800, (AtticusF)
wrote:

>Hey, gang:
>
>I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
>just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
>wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
>photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>
>I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
>buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
>(memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
>digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
>optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
>lacking in the specifics.
>
>What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
>factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
>down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
>technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
>the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
>mean.
>
>My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
>it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.
>
>If emailing directly, use .
>
>Thanks so much!
>
>Atticus Fisher



It seems to me that a good entry point is to determine why the reader
wants the camera, what they intend to do with it.

Heavy duty business use, where an income is dependent on the
reliability of the camera, hobby photography where the object is to
satisfy the user's artistic ambitions, something to use to document
other interests, hobby, growing kids.

This would affect the budget and the amount of time the purchaser is
willing to spend mastering the camera.

Technical details: www,dpreview.com and links from that site.


--

- Charles
-
-does not play well with others
 
Reply With Quote
 
Owamanga
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 17:45:43 GMT, Charles <>
wrote:

>On 3 Nov 2004 08:58:00 -0800, (AtticusF)
>wrote:
>
>>Hey, gang:
>>
>>I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
>>just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
>>wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
>>photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>>
>>I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
>>buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
>>(memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
>>digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
>>optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
>>lacking in the specifics.
>>
>>What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
>>factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
>>down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
>>technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
>>the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
>>mean.
>>
>>My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
>>it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.
>>
>>If emailing directly, use .
>>
>>Thanks so much!
>>
>>Atticus Fisher

>
>
>It seems to me that a good entry point is to determine why the reader
>wants the camera, what they intend to do with it.
>
>Heavy duty business use, where an income is dependent on the
>reliability of the camera, hobby photography where the object is to
>satisfy the user's artistic ambitions, something to use to document
>other interests, hobby, growing kids.
>
>This would affect the budget and the amount of time the purchaser is
>willing to spend mastering the camera.
>
>Technical details: www,dpreview.com and links from that site.


Not to forget the digital camera replaces the polaroid for home-made
porn. You should definitely cover that angle in your article.



--
Owamanga!
 
Reply With Quote
 
Bryce
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
As a contributing writer, surely you've queried Google?


"AtticusF" <> wrote in message
news: om...
> Hey, gang:
>
> I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
> just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
> wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
> photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>
> I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
> buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
> (memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
> digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
> optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
> lacking in the specifics.
>
> What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
> factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
> down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
> technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
> the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
> mean.
>
> My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
> it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.
>
> If emailing directly, use .
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Atticus Fisher



 
Reply With Quote
 
Aerticus
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
would you like my consultancy fees?

Aerticus

"AtticusF" <> wrote in message
news: om...
> Hey, gang:
>
> I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
> just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
> wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
> photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>
> I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
> buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
> (memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
> digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
> optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
> lacking in the specifics.
>
> What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
> factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
> down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
> technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
> the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
> mean.
>
> My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
> it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.
>
> If emailing directly, use .
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Atticus Fisher



 
Reply With Quote
 
BobS
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
Someone once said "Follow the money". I'll revise that a bit and say
"Follow the marketing". These camera companies probably spend more money on
marketing their products than they do on research and development. You seem
to have a handle on the technicalities of selecting a camera but that always
isn't what "sells" a camera or what persuades one to purchase a particular
camera. Marketing does. Perception vs. technical specs - which do you think
sells more cameras?

Look at the -vast- number of digital cameras available, some with 10's of
models available from each company. Most are simply repackaged,
dumbed-down, price-point driven derivatives of the more featured models in
different skins. Look at each model line, make a chart and break them down
into subdivisions and compare features. Now look at the price-points and you
can then determine which market segment the camera was targeted for and what
features they can expect for X dollars. That's opposite the approach of "How
much should I spend for feature X". Perhaps contacting a few manufacturers
and asking them why they developed a product the way they did (what were the
drivers) will get you some valuable insight for your article.

You could go to a store like Best Buy (or one that does not just sell
cameras) and ask the salesperson to help you select a camera. If they've
received any training at all, you'll get the standard talk about megapixels
and perhaps hear a word or two about some common features and functions
while they're trying to figure out how much you're willing to part with.
Some will ask - point blank, "What's your budget" and that then determines
the features and functionality you will get. Only used car salesmen used to
get the look you'll give him...

Now go to a real camera store and one that hopefully sells several name
brands and ask the same question. You'll certainly be asked some questions
that will size you up as to how much time they'll spend with you (tire
kicker or future customer..). They hopefully subscribe to the theory that
an educated customer makes a better customer and that their products and
services are a total package that they can offer you - plus a long term
commitment. Be prepared to get technical and to discuss pro's and con's and
feature benefits of each brand as well as be questioned about your intended
use and most of all - your expectations.

My priorities in making many purchase decisions are: (not in order of
preference)

1. Who will I purchase the product from and why?
2. Do they understand my needs, can they properly advise me and can I trust
them?
3. Their product knowledge, experience and local business presence have
definite value to me - how much am I willing to pay for that?
4. What is their reputation?

So, in my opinion, you need to include how you determine -who- you purchase
a camera from as one of the most important factors to consider.

And "Should you switch to digital?" opens Pandora's box. The person that
buy's a point-and-shoot camera, takes the media to the local plug 'n print
machine and hopes for the best - needs the most help in selecting the
smartest camera available and is the one that will benefit the most from a
retailer that knows the products. The amateur/advanced hobbyist, will
already be aware that they will need a certain level of computer skills and
the hardware investment to use the myriad of software available that will
enable them to make better pictures. Levels above the amateur.... I would
have to assume they're all over the map from what I've read and I doubt
they'll be reading your introductory article.

Some of these may be helpful.

http://www.dpreview.com
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/photokina2004/
http://www.photozone.de/2Equipment/easytxt.htm
http://media.gn.apc.org/feesguide/photo.html
http://www.koelnmesse.de/wEnglisch/photokina/index.htm
http://www.popularphotography.com/de...p?section_id=4
http://www.offrench.net/photos/artic...ge_devices.php
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/index.asp

Bob S.


"AtticusF" <> wrote in message
news: om...
> Hey, gang:
>
> I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
> just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
> wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
> photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>
> I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
> buying a digital camera, including resolution, battery life, storage
> (memory) types, manual controls, ease-of-use, flash, zoom (optical vs.
> digital), LCD size and brightness, computer platform compatibility,
> optical viewfinder, types of lenses accepted (or not), etc, but am
> lacking in the specifics.
>
> What I'm looking for, then, is two things: 1) the most important
> factors to consider when buying a digital camera. Should I break it
> down by need (point-and-shoot, prosumer, and pro?) Or organize by
> technical spec (resolution, controls, etc)? And 2) where I might find
> the nitty gritty details about technical specifications and what they
> mean.
>
> My deadline is not far away, so any advice would be appreciated, even
> it's nothing more than a pointer to a Web site or how-to book.
>
> If emailing directly, use .
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Atticus Fisher



 
Reply With Quote
 
Owamanga
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:03:20 GMT, "BobS" <> wrote:

>Someone once said "Follow the money". I'll revise that a bit and say
>"Follow the marketing".


And remember to mention that Nikons are better than Canons.

...or the other way round, it really doesn't matter.

--
Owamanga!
 
Reply With Quote
 
Frank ess
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
AtticusF wrote:
> Hey, gang:
>
> I'm a contributing writer for the Boston Phoenix and writing a
> just-in-time-for-the-holidays piece on digital photography. My editor
> wants an introductory article targeted at the general user and/or film
> photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.
>


A little reality never hurts:

No matter how much they study, no matter which bit of hardware digital
novices settle on, they will learn more _after_ they make the plunge.
Every post-purchase experience will have increased meaning in comparison
to comparison sites and camera specifications.

If they have, through experience or study, developed a list of "needs"
or requirements, they may find a different approach useful: think in
terms of which camera falls short in fewest critical areas rather than
trying (in vain) to find one that is perfect.

My own recommendation would be to buy a mid- or low-range 3-or-more MP
camera with the expectation that after a few months' use they will make
a better decision when and if they decide to move up, how far to move
up, and when. That way the original investment may turn out to be
sufficient and modest; if not, lesser wasted early expense and better
decisions in later acquisitions will be benefits.

--
Frank ess


 
Reply With Quote
 
Bruce Lewis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
(AtticusF) writes:

> My editor wants an introductory article targeted at the general user
> and/or film photographer who wants to make the leap to digital.


Slightly serious film photographers already have sources of information
about digital. I would suggest targeting more narrowly at the general
user. My answers will be more along those lines.

> I have a vague general knowledge of the factors to consider when
> buying a digital camera


That's good; it probably corresponds to what people are thinking about.

> including resolution


People who find that a lot of their photos come out as tiny figures in a
huge background would benefit from 5MP cameras. For those who almost
always frame their shots nicely 3MP is more than enough.

> battery life


Absolutely an important comparison factor.

> storage (memory) types


Any camera you find in the store today will hook up to your computer by
USB and look like a disk drive. The various memory types are not
entirely irrelevant, but are probably the last thing I'd talk to a
general user about.

> manual controls, ease-of-use


Very important, and you should definitely tell people to try before they
buy. You can quickly find out how easy it is to get a good shot.

> zoom (optical vs. digital)


You may actually get consensus on this one: digital zoom is vastly
inferior to optical zoom. With digital zoom you're guaranteed to lose
resolution; with optical zoom it just depends on the lighting and how
steady you hold the camera.

> LCD size and brightness


In my opinion this matters little. All that matters is how easily you
can zoom in to spot-check the quality of the shot.

> computer platform compatibility


This has been standardized into almost a non-issue, at least in terms of
downloading from the camera.

For uploading to the camera, there may be compatibility issues.
However, uploading to an Internet print service has sufficed for me. I
exclusively use Debian GNU/Linux with my camera, and the gphoto2 driver
unfortunately doesn't support uploading for my Canon Powershot S45.

> optical viewfinder


This is key. A friend of mine just went through a pile of 105 photos
from a new digital camera, and many of them were blurry. I think it's
awfully tough to stay steady while holding the camera in front of you
and watching the LCD. Remind your general users to put both elbows
against their body and use both hands to press the camera up to their
face.

> types of lenses accepted (or not)


SLR cameras are probably something for a whole different article.

> etc


Orientation sensor: The camera senses its orientatation at the time a
photo is shot, and records it in the JPEG file. For general users who
wouldn't otherwise fuss over each individual photo, not having to rotate
means saving significant work.

Please let us know when the article comes out.


--
Make that pile of digital photos presentable: http://ourdoings.com/
It's quicker and easier than you think.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thug cops in Denver arrest ABC reporter for photographing lobbyistactivity. ---*--- Digital Photography 8 09-03-2008 12:50 PM
Auto scan reporter not working Zak Computer Security 7 11-02-2006 06:45 PM
Old 1950's Gitzo Reporter tripod paul Digital Photography 3 02-19-2005 05:59 AM
Newbie questions on Crystal Reporter Raymond Du ASP .Net 1 04-16-2004 12:34 AM
Re: Reporter Asks Help with Story on Sick Vets Baron Maximillian von Schtuldeworfshiseundurheimhoppen Computer Support 0 10-19-2003 01:14 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57