Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Digital Photography > Req Canon S1 that records video in mpeg4, any such beast?

Reply
Thread Tools

Req Canon S1 that records video in mpeg4, any such beast?

 
 
No Body
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
I've been reading and reading about all the diff cameras and the canon
s1 seems like a great camera. My only criticism is that when recording
in 640*480 movie mode it uses 1.5 mbyte/sec apparently! so that's about
2 mins on a 256 mbyte Card!!! This seems crazy as Digital-TV mpeg2 is
only about 0.5 mbyte/sec and divx is great quality at only 0.2 mbyte/sec
(thats 21 mins on a 256mb card).

I peered down the Mustek route who do mpeg4 but at 640*480 its only @ 10
fps on the dv5500 which is useless and I'm sure these cheap multi
function cameras sux. I had a umax550 before and it was fun but pretty
crap at everything.

I wonder if there are any of the trustworthy camera manufacturers
(canon, nikon, etc) planning to go the mpeg4 route, so we can get
640x480 (or higher) but use mpeg4 or at least mpeg2 to store it. If
Canon bought out an s1 that used mpeg4 or mepg2 I'd buy one yesterday as
it would then appear have it all. But at the huge data rate the 640x480
movie mode currently uses it seems nothing more than an add-on gimmick,
limited to 9mins / 1gb per video.

I therefore am considering just getting a cheap 2-3mpix camera and
waiting ANOTHER year until something decent comes out, anyone else
waiting on this or with any ideas to solving the portable camera+cam
issue facing us all today in 2004?

S1 = so near and yet so far...
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
SteveB
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
Olympus C770 does mpeg4 movies.



"No Body" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:4188f269$0$110$(E-Mail Removed).. .
> I've been reading and reading about all the diff cameras and the canon s1
> seems like a great camera. My only criticism is that when recording in
> 640*480 movie mode it uses 1.5 mbyte/sec apparently! so that's about 2
> mins on a 256 mbyte Card!!! This seems crazy as Digital-TV mpeg2 is only
> about 0.5 mbyte/sec and divx is great quality at only 0.2 mbyte/sec (thats
> 21 mins on a 256mb card).
>
> I peered down the Mustek route who do mpeg4 but at 640*480 its only @ 10
> fps on the dv5500 which is useless and I'm sure these cheap multi function
> cameras sux. I had a umax550 before and it was fun but pretty crap at
> everything.
>
> I wonder if there are any of the trustworthy camera manufacturers (canon,
> nikon, etc) planning to go the mpeg4 route, so we can get 640x480 (or
> higher) but use mpeg4 or at least mpeg2 to store it. If Canon bought out
> an s1 that used mpeg4 or mepg2 I'd buy one yesterday as it would then
> appear have it all. But at the huge data rate the 640x480 movie mode
> currently uses it seems nothing more than an add-on gimmick, limited to
> 9mins / 1gb per video.
>
> I therefore am considering just getting a cheap 2-3mpix camera and waiting
> ANOTHER year until something decent comes out, anyone else waiting on this
> or with any ideas to solving the portable camera+cam issue facing us all
> today in 2004?
>
> S1 = so near and yet so far...



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
No Body
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
OK I'm reading up on it, the initial spec seems to look awesome, just
what I was looking for, thanks for the pointer. A bit pricey though @
280 but if the gear-lust takes a good firm hold there is probably
little I can do to resist. If anyone has one of these and would like to
comment then feel free.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Aerticus
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2004
It has the spec I am looking for but a 3MP sensor?

On the other hand noise levels on sample images seems quite pleasant

At the moment my list of contenders is
S1 IS
FZ20

the proprietary LiON and noise has tempered my enthusiasm for the FZ20

The S1 IS seems good on samples

I guess I'll have to think about it a bit longer - perhaps the sensor in the
FZ20 is being driven a bit too hard giving rise to moise that is a bit more
obvious than in th S1 IS or FZ15

Hey - ho ... thinking time

Aerticus

"No Body" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:41895a31$0$10791$(E-Mail Removed) ...
> OK I'm reading up on it, the initial spec seems to look awesome, just what
> I was looking for, thanks for the pointer. A bit pricey though @ 280 but
> if the gear-lust takes a good firm hold there is probably little I can do
> to resist. If anyone has one of these and would like to comment then feel
> free.



 
Reply With Quote
 
David J Taylor
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
Aerticus wrote:
[]
> I guess I'll have to think about it a bit longer - perhaps the sensor
> in the FZ20 is being driven a bit too hard giving rise to moise that
> is a bit more obvious than in th S1 IS or FZ15


Does the noise matter with your picture sizes and viewing methods you
have? These samples viewed at 1:1 zoom may not be representative of your
needs. Try an FZ20 in your environment - I reckon much of this noise
problem is over-rated by those who have never used film, and that zero
noise is somewhat of a fashion.

Cheers,
David


 
Reply With Quote
 
No Body
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
SteveB wrote:

> Olympus C770 does mpeg4 movies.
>


having looked into it I finally tracked down some actual movie clips
from c770 and it seems that despite it being mpeg4 which is perfectly
capable of great quality, especially at the 2500kbit/sec that it uses,
it doesn't look good. So even at that price, again the movie mode is
little more than a gimmick. The camera spec looks great with 10x zoom
and 4mpix but doesn't have the image stabliser the canon s1 has.

I think I'm left looking at either getting a cheap gimmicky mustek, such
as dv5000/5500 that I know will not be particularly great at anything
but will do some sort of a job at 90 and can do 352x288@30fps in mpeg4.
Or maybe getting a nikon coolpix 3200 which will do 640x480 + 352x240
albeit only at 15 fps and NOT using mpeg4 but should give decent stills
and is nice and small. Then I guess the idea would be to wait for
another 2 years when decent mpeg4 cams with good stills should exist. If
you look at a DVD converted to mpeg4 at 2,500kbit it would be as good as
the DVD, so why a camera using that resolution (olympus c770) isn't is a
bit confusing but...

Annoying though is that none of these seem to use compact flash which is
what I have from prev camera, canon seems to use these BUT the Jessops
guy didn't seem to rate canon, saying they were not that responsive.
Others have reported this also.

this has a link to an mpeg4 movie on the olympus c7770 near the bottom
of the review. Dunno if it's the content or the camera but it doesn't
look great
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/ol..._770uz-review/
 
Reply With Quote
 
Hans-Georg Michna
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2004
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 14:59:57 +0000, No Body <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>I've been reading and reading about all the diff cameras and the canon
>s1 seems like a great camera. My only criticism is that when recording
>in 640*480 movie mode it uses 1.5 mbyte/sec apparently! so that's about
>2 mins on a 256 mbyte Card!!! This seems crazy as Digital-TV mpeg2 is
>only about 0.5 mbyte/sec and divx is great quality at only 0.2 mbyte/sec
>(thats 21 mins on a 256mb card).


He, Mr. No Body:

My best guess is that the processor needed for good MPEG-4
compression would be more expensive than a bigger memory card.

Hans-Georg

--
No mail, please.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem in running a basic code in python 3.3.0 that includes HTML file Satabdi Mukherjee Python 1 04-04-2013 07:48 PM
req converting video to flash video examples David Buckley ASP .Net 1 04-22-2008 07:55 PM
501 PIX "deny any any" "allow any any" Any Anybody? Networking Student Cisco 4 11-16-2006 10:40 PM
req.isRequestedSessionIdValid() and req.getSession() Joshua Java 8 09-29-2004 09:40 PM



Advertisments