Russell B <> wrote in
news::
> Despite all his or her rage, Soapy <> is still
> just a rat in a cage:
>
>>Russell B <> wrote in
>>news: m:
>>
>>> Despite all his or her rage, Soapy <> is still
>>> just a rat in a cage:
>>>
>>>>Russell B <> wrote in
>>>>news: m:
>>>>
>>>>> Despite all his or her rage, Soapy <> is
>>>>> still just a rat in a cage:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Russell B <> wrote in
>>>>>>news:gljol0hn9porghlbouvie6t49p0fi64b9h@4ax. com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Despite all his or her rage, Soapy <> is
>>>>>>> still just a rat in a cage:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Russell B <> wrote in
>>>>>>>>news:jqvml0lb9qeegju3meqhu98q79br3d83k2@4a x.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Despite all his or her rage, TAP <> is
>>>>>>>>> still just a rat in a cage:
>>>>>>>>>>In article <>,
>>>>>>>>>> Russell B <> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Welcome aboard, TAP! I'll certainly try to keep the Van
>>>>>>>>>>>Halen content to a minimum, but you have to understand
>>>>>>>>>>>that there is only so much I can do, given the theme of
>>>>>>>>>>>tonight's planned thread. After all, the whole gist of
>>>>>>>>>>>the thread is that I will "call" out a line that should
>>>>>>>>>>>be familiar to all Van Halen fans, and you (members of
>>>>>>>>>>>the newsgroup) will "respond" with the appropriate answer
>>>>>>>>>>>line.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>As long as the appropriate response isn't to cut and paste
>>>>>>>>>>37 concert reviews, I'll cope.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>That said, I will do what I can. Thanks again for your
>>>>>>>>>>>participation, and I look forward to hearing from you
>>>>>>>>>>>later tonight!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Ditto!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Excellent. I expect to be making the "call" post some
>>>>>>>>> time shortly after 9:00 Pacific Standard Time tonight,
>>>>>>>>> unless there are any objections from other participants in
>>>>>>>>> this ad hoc planning council. I hope you're all ready to
>>>>>>>>> "respond"!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You need to do these a little earlier in the evening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FU. I'm a busy guy. Take it or leave it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Is the stress from trying to pull off new shtick making you
>>>>>>all snippy?
>>>>>
>>>>> NO MORE QUESTIONS.
>>>>
>>>>Are you all ****y because the last won failed miserably?
>>>
>>> Sure, things haven't gone as well as I planned in that thread.
>>> It's possible that some mistakes were made. In retrospect,
>>> perhaps I should have devoted more resources to the thread, and
>>> done more "post-thread" planning. But I still maintain that my
>>> reasons for launching that thread were good ones, and I firmly
>>> believe that the only option now is to stay the course and
>>> finish the mission, at whatever cost. This is no time for
>>> criticism or second-guessing. Frankly, your divisive and
>>> pessimistic comments make me question your loyalty to atr-w.
>>>
>>
>>It was the wrong thread, in the wrong newsgroup, at the wrong
>>time.
>
> Nonsense. I had good intel, Soapy. Good intel. And either way,
> we have no choice now but to charge on, boldly,
> confidently--blindly, if you will--regardless of the consequences.
> Your protests--no, let me finish!-- only serve to demoralize our
> brave posters over in alt.movies.
>
Well, I think that's wrong, and I think we can do better.
I know I can do a better job in this thread. I have a plan to have a
summit with all of the involved newsgroups, something you have not yet
achieved, you've not yet been able to bring posters to the table.
We can do a better job of training the newsgroup regulars to answer the
"call and response" threads in the correct manner, and I know that we
can do a better job of preparing such threads.
--
__ __ __ __ O O O
/ / | / | / | / | O o o
(___ ( |(___|(___|(___| o _____________o
)| )| )| ) o.;-----------./|
__/ |__/ | / | __/ // S O A P Y // |
|'-----------'| /
jgs | | /
Smeeter #30-something '-------------'`
|