Billy <> wrote:
> "Wizard" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Billy <> wrote:
>>> "Wizard" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> Billy <> wrote:
>>>>> "dwacon" <> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fbQYd.62418$7z6.47411@lakeread04...
>>>>>> Is it "he walked over toward the computer" or is it "he walked
>>>>>> over towards the computer" ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The microsoft word grammar checker doesn't complain either way...
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why not simply, "he walked towards the computer" or "he walked
>>>>> over to the computer"?
>>>>
>>>> Walking towards something is not the same as walking over to
>>>> something, you useless ****stick.
>>>>
>>> Hence the first option I offered/asked about.
>>> Why use the "over"?
>>
>> Why are you asking me, you ****ed in the head ****? It was you who
>> ****ing well used the phrase, hey. Do you often write things then
>> later have no idea why the **** you wrote what you did, you useless
>> ****bubble?
>>
> OK obviously you are just being an asshole with no comprehension.
> For your slow mind here it is again.
> Rather than say "he walked over toward the computer", why not say it
> in a straight forward manner as in "he walked towards the computer".
> To complicated, then FOAD.
Read your own words, chicken ****er.
'Why not simply, "he walked towards the computer" or "he walked over to the
computer"?'
See that two-letter word there, or? Well, that's a conjunction between two
independent clauses and marks one clause as being an alternative to the
other.
So, the choices are either ("why not"):
1. "he walked towards the computer"
OR
2. "he walked over to the computer"
For the ****witted amongst us, that would be you, I will state again:
Walking towards something is not the same as walking over to something, you
useless ****stick.
Now, you were saying something about comprehension, yes?
|
Similar Threads
