«

hugh jass, <>, the malfunctioning,
domesticated french bean, and chaff cutter, disparaged:

> So far, I don't find these monitors have a sharp enough image or high
> enough resolution...
> Has anybody found one that has good quality display?
> The apple screens (made by LG I believe) look good, but I'm surprised
> they only have a 400:1 contrast ratio. What should I look for if I
> want as sharp an image as possible? any advice?
> Thanks,
> hj

You shouldn't look. You should wait. Even the 17" and 19" 4ms response time
LCDs are still not good enough if you want to do anything more than ****
about typing emails.

Buy a ****ing Trinitron based flat screen and be done with it.

That's what I have now and it's probably why I won't be happy with current
LCD technology.
.... but I need a second monitor and don't have the space on my desk!

"Virag the tooth-catheteriser"
<virag.the.tooth--women> wrote in message
news: ed.fat.and.ugly.anna-kourn
ikova...
> hugh jass, <>, the malfunctioning,
> domesticated french bean, and chaff cutter, disparaged:
>
> > So far, I don't find these monitors have a sharp enough image or high
> > enough resolution...
> > Has anybody found one that has good quality display?
> > The apple screens (made by LG I believe) look good, but I'm surprised
> > they only have a 400:1 contrast ratio. What should I look for if I
> > want as sharp an image as possible? any advice?
> > Thanks,
> > hj
>
> You shouldn't look. You should wait. Even the 17" and 19" 4ms response
time
> LCDs are still not good enough if you want to do anything more than ****
> about typing emails.
>
> Buy a ****ing Trinitron based flat screen and be done with it.
>

Stevo wrote:

Stevo
(pull the PIN to reply by e-mail)

Like this:











Did I do that right?