«

TripTych, <>, the no-good, shitty pantaloon, and dishonest
grocer and dealer in bad spices, trickled:

> If receiving junk mail ever becomes an Olympic sport I WILL TAKE THE
> GOLD.
>
> Serious question: Is there a world record for the most spam
> sent/received in one day? Does any company track stuff like that?

One person, four million spams a day, ten valid mails a day...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4023667.stm

Yirug the acquisitive wrote:

> One person, four million spams a day, ten valid mails a day...
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4023667.stm
>

<ARTICLE QUOTE>

"Literally there's a whole department almost that takes care of it," he
said.

"But he said only about 10 e-mails a day made it through to his inbox,
because of anti-spam technology that filters the messages."

</ARTICLE QUOTE>

Um, so Bill Gates' "anti-spam technology" is "almost a whole department
that takes care of it?"

What am I missing here?

--
http://www.polhemus.cc/blog

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:38:25 GMT, A Nengineer <>
wrote:

>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4023667.stm
>>
>
><ARTICLE QUOTE>
>
>"Literally there's a whole department almost that takes care of it," he
>said.
>
>"But he said only about 10 e-mails a day made it through to his inbox,
>because of anti-spam technology that filters the messages."
>
></ARTICLE QUOTE>
>
>Um, so Bill Gates' "anti-spam technology" is "almost a whole department
>that takes care of it?"
>
>What am I missing here?

"At the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in January, Mr Gates
predicted that technology would make spam "a thing of the past" within
two years."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Isn't this the same guy who said 64k of ram
ought to be enough for anybody?

Swill

--
The reasons for censoring Britt Ekland's erotic dancing in the room
next to Edward Woodward in the Inn, in the film "The Wicker Man" are
clear to me - after all, decency is perhaps the single most important
factor to be considered in film-making. Too many film-makers
concentrate on the way people think and feel and not, unfortunately,
on how people *should* feel and think.
I have seen both versions of the film, both with and without the
lascivious Miss Ekland's performance, and I feel moved to ask you,
does burning a virgin in a large wooden contraption actually improve
crop yields, and is this not a better approach than employing the
methods of genetic modification?