![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
Wireless Networking - Pocket-Sized Wi-Fi Signal Detector |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The Kensington
WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid (Singapore). The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder and WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector (www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker (www.wifiseeker.com)? Paul DeVivo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul DeVivo" <> wrote in message news:... > I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The Kensington > WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid (Singapore). > The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder and > WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. > well of course they are superior, they have one more led! |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
It's a waiste of money...
You can easely build one yourselve for less then 5$ in components.... antenna, few diodes, one IC and a few LED's....done... >-----Original Message----- >I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The Kensington >WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid (Singapore). >The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder and >WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. > >Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector >(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker (www.wifiseeker.com)? > > >. > |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
care to post some diagrams for us?
m9876c at yahoo dot com ---------------------------- a waiste of money... You can easely build one yourselve for less then 5$ in components.... antenna, few diodes, one IC and a few LED's....done... >-----Original Message----- >I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The Kensington >WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid (Singapore). >The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder and >WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. > >Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector >(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker (www.wifiseeker.com)? > |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
If you can settle for a laptop-sized detector, you can use a laptop with a
PCMCIA wireless card and NetStumbler software to find Wi-Fi signals. I've done this from inside a car. Works amazingly well. "Al Dente" <> wrote in message news:... > care to post some diagrams for us? > m9876c at yahoo dot com > > ---------------------------- > a waiste of money... > You can easely build one yourselve for less then 5$ in > components.... antenna, few diodes, one IC and a few > LED's....done... > >-----Original Message----- > >I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi > sensors: The Kensington > >WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from > Smartid (Singapore). > >The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED > WiFi Finder and > >WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED > Kensington. > > > >Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector > >(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker > (www.wifiseeker.com)? > > > > > |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Adding a high-gain antenna would make the detector even more sensitive.
"Box134" <> wrote in message news:... > If you can settle for a laptop-sized detector, you can use a laptop with a > PCMCIA wireless card and NetStumbler software to find Wi-Fi signals. I've > done this from inside a car. Works amazingly well. > > > "Al Dente" <> wrote in message > news:... > > care to post some diagrams for us? > > m9876c at yahoo dot com > > > > ---------------------------- > > a waiste of money... > > You can easely build one yourselve for less then 5$ in > > components.... antenna, few diodes, one IC and a few > > LED's....done... > > >-----Original Message----- > > >I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi > > sensors: The Kensington > > >WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from > > Smartid (Singapore). > > >The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED > > WiFi Finder and > > >WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED > > Kensington. > > > > > >Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector > > >(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker > > (www.wifiseeker.com)? > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:21:26 -0400, "Paul DeVivo" <>
wrote: >I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The Kensington >WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid (Singapore). >The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder and >WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. > >Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector >(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker (www.wifiseeker.com)? > The first version of the Kensington was a piece of junk. Mine died after a short time and the "life time warranty" was appearantly the "lifetime" of the device not the purchaser. I have not replaced it. There are some clever sounding approaches available. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Review of pocket Wi-Fi detectors
http://www.handtops.com/show/news/68 And a newer, more expensive one http://digital-lifestyles.info/displ...bution&id=2478 Ted "Antenna Erector" <> wrote in message news:... > On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:21:26 -0400, "Paul DeVivo" <> > wrote: > >>I've been reading about the new $30 pocket Wi-Fi sensors: The > Kensington >>WiFi Finder, the WiFiSeeker, and the Wifi Detector from Smartid > (Singapore). >>The reviews I've been able to find suggest the four-LED WiFi Finder > and >>WiFiSeeker are similar and superior to the three-LED Kensington. >> >>Has anyone information about comparing the WiFi Detector >>(www.smartid.com.sg) with the WiFiSeeker (www.wifiseeker.com)? >> > > The first version of the Kensington was a piece of junk. Mine died > after a short time and the "life time warranty" was appearantly the > "lifetime" of the device not the purchaser. I have not replaced it. > There are some clever sounding approaches available. |
|