«

Hello, I have a doubt about generics usage with the iterator
interface.
The following declarations should be 'equivalent', I mean, all the
methods return the same type (a reference to Object):

Iterator it;
Iterator<Object> it;

Well, now consider the following code:

Vector<Animal> v;
....
Iterator<Object> it = v.iterator();

It doesn't work, since v.iterator() returns a Iterator<Animal>
reference, which is incompatible with Iterator<Object>,
but:

Vector<Animal> v;
....
Iterator it = v.iterator();

It works fine, but v.iterator() returns an Iterator<Animal> reference,
why are both references compatible??

TIA

On Feb 11, 3:14 am, "Neroku" <n37...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I have a doubt about generics usage with the iterator
> interface.
> The following declarations should be 'equivalent', I mean, all the
> methods return the same type (a reference to Object):
>
> Iterator it;
> Iterator<Object> it;
>
> Well, now consider the following code:
>
> Vector<Animal> v;
> ...
> Iterator<Object> it = v.iterator();
>
> It doesn't work, since v.iterator() returns a Iterator<Animal>
> reference, which is incompatible with Iterator<Object>,
> but:
>
> Vector<Animal> v;
> ...
> Iterator it = v.iterator();
>
> It works fine, but v.iterator() returns an Iterator<Animal> reference,
> why are both references compatible??
>
> TIA

Try Iterator<? extends Object> it

Neroku wrote:
> Hello, I have a doubt about generics usage with the iterator
> interface.
> The following declarations should be 'equivalent', I mean, all the
> methods return the same type (a reference to Object):
>
> Iterator it;
> Iterator<Object> it;

They are not equivalent. The first is a raw type and the second is a generic type.

> Vector<Animal> v;
> ...
> Iterator<Object> it = v.iterator();
>
> It doesn't work, since v.iterator() returns a Iterator<Animal>
> reference, which is incompatible with Iterator<Object>,
> but:
>
> Vector<Animal> v;
> ...
> Iterator it = v.iterator();
>
> It works fine, but v.iterator() returns an Iterator<Animal> reference,
> why are both references compatible??

They aren't, really. You would get an "unchecked" warning, but it is
reluctantly permitted because Iterator is the erasure of all parametrized
Iterator types. You should avoid using raw types and generic types in the same
expressions, except for the few places where Java pretty much forces you to.

Read the Java Language Specification on these topics.

-Lew