Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Java > Host

Reply
 
 
Chris Uppal
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-11-2007
Alex Hunsley wrote:

> Yup, Ethereal/wireshark is good stuff for monitoring HTTP traffic and
> more, although it may be a little harder to use (although not bad once
> you know how). I prefer Proxomitron for lightweight HTTP monitoring.


Different tools for different jobs...

Proxomitron seems to be (I've never tried it) very much about general-purpose
HTTP monitoring and/or modification and (I presume) is good at that task. By
the same token, I wouldn't trust it to tell me /exactly/ what's going up and
down the wire -- things like character sets, header ordering, incorrectly
formed headers, and so on. In particular, I wouldn't trust it to tell me what
the HTTP client /would/ be sending if it were connected directly to the server,
rather than a proxy. And of course, only tool like Wireshark/Ethereal will
tell you about package boundaries, network retries, DNS lookups, etc, etc, (not
to mention other protocols). OTOH, Wireshark/Ethereal can't even make a stab
at telling you what the data going up and down an SSL link is...

But if you had to use only one (and I /do/ use only one) then
Wireshark/Ethereal wins hands-down

-- chris



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Martin Gregorie
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-11-2007
Alex Hunsley wrote:
> I only just recently found out about Ethereal forking off into a product
> called Wireshark. The ethereal site doesn't mention Wireshark for weird
> legal reasons. I believe wireshark is the more up-to-date/recent project...
>

I heard that the name change happened when the author of the program
changed jobs. For some reason the company had rights to the name
"Ethereal" but not to the software and wouldn't release the name.

So, yes, Wireshark is the most up-to-date version.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
bjeremy
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      01-11-2007
> OTOH, Wireshark/Ethereal can't even make a stab
> at telling you what the data going up and down an SSL link is...



Sure it will... it just won't unencrypt it for you... but if you have
time on your hands, you can determine the cipher and hash from the
record layer and then "have at it"

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to refer a control in the host page from a user control if the host page using masterpage Jerry Qu ASP .Net 1 02-20-2009 07:41 PM
Dane Cook: Great S.N.L. host or GREATEST S.N.L. host? Jojo the 90lb hottie Digital Photography 1 02-14-2007 04:55 AM
Cisco PIX 501 - Port forwarded to an internal host via Static NAT doesn't work from internal host JoelSeph Cisco 9 01-23-2006 03:52 PM
PIX: how to allow 1 host from outside interface to access another host on the inside interface? jonnah Cisco 1 04-21-2004 02:26 PM
request.getHeader("Host") returns wrong host name Orpheus66 Java 0 07-30-2003 02:59 PM



Advertisments