Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > C837 High value BER valid sec

Reply
Thread Tools

C837 High value BER valid sec

 
 
Tom Lauwereins
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-26-2005
On one of our 837's we have a very high value for "BER Valid Sec"
What does this mean?
Any ideas?

rt-*****-a036#sh dsl int atm 0
ATU-R (DS) ATU-C (US)
Modem Status: Showtime (DMTDSL_SHOWTIME)
DSL Mode: ANSI T1.413
ANSI Issue/rev: 2/1 2/1
Vendor ID: 0x0022 0x0022
Capacity Used: 23% 47%
Noise Margin: 23.5 dB 23.0 dB
Output Power: 20.0 dBm 12.0 dBm
Attenuation: 32.5 dB 14.0 dB
Defect Status: None None
Last Fail Code: None
Selftest Result: 0x49
Subfunction: 0x15
Interrupts: 666 (1 spurious)
Activations: 1
Init FW: embedded
Operartion FW: embedded
SW Version: 3.8129
FW Version: 0x1A04

Interleave Fast Interleave
Fast
Speed (kbps): 0 1120 0 384
Reed-Solomon EC: 0 0 0 0
CRC Errors: 0 0 0 0
Header Errors: 0 0 0 0
Bit Errors: 0 0
BER Valid sec: 0 *13537*
BER Invalid sec: 0 0
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Upgrade path: MCSA2000:Sec -> MCSA2003 -> MCSE2003:Sec ? The Rev [MCT] MCSE 0 12-13-2005 12:22 PM
Re: Upgrade path: MCSA2000:Sec -> MCSA2003 -> MCSE2003:Sec ? Bob Christian MCSE 1 12-13-2005 08:36 AM
No PAT from Higher Sec to Lower Sec interface Clemens Schwaighofer Cisco 0 10-20-2005 10:18 AM
Upgrade path: MCSA2000:Sec -> MCSA2003 -> MCSE2003:Sec ? =?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?= MCSE 4 09-07-2005 06:55 PM
C837 High value 'BER valid sec' (2nd post) Tom Lauwereins Cisco 6 04-30-2005 06:49 AM



Advertisments