Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > NAT - another problem?

Reply
Thread Tools

NAT - another problem?

 
 
=?iso-8859-15?Q?=F8ystein?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-09-2005
Got problems with my network (Cisco 805 Routers)

I got 3 site with four machines each:

All the machines on the sites has the same IP addresses. This is something
that I am not allowed to change.

Machine 1 : IP 20.0.1.24
Machine 2 : IP 20.0.1.25
Machine 3 : IP 20.0.1.10

I have alos a fourth site that should be able to access all the 9
machines. The problems is that they use the same IP addresses.

My solution is to use static NAT:

Site 1:
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.10 10.0.1.10
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.24 10.0.1.14
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.25 10.0.1.15
Router LAN IP 20.0.1.1 ip nat inside
Router WAN IP 10.0.1.1 ip nat outside
Site 2:
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.10 10.0.1.20
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.24 10.0.1.24
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.25 10.0.1.25
Router LAN IP 20.0.1.1 ip nat inside
Router WAN IP 10.0.1.3 ip nat outside
Site 3:
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.10 10.0.1.30
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.24 10.0.1.34
ip nat inside source static 20.0.1.25 10.0.1.35
Router LAN IP 20.0.1.1 ip nat inside
Router WAN IP 10.0.1.4 ip nat outside

On site 4 my routing table looks like this:

I do know that some classless subnetting would be better for the size of
my routing table...
ip route 10.0.1.10 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.1
ip route 10.0.1.14 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.1
ip route 10.0.1.15 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.1
ip route 10.0.1.20 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.3
ip route 10.0.1.24 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.3
ip route 10.0.1.25 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.3
ip route 10.0.1.30 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.4
ip route 10.0.1.34 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.4
ip route 10.0.1.35 255.255.255.255 10.0.1.4

All my routers is available to ping all the machines in the network. My
PROBLEM is that the clients on the LAN are not able to reach other clients
on different sites. All clients has 20.0.1.1 as default router.

Is my NAT configures correctly?
Am I allowed to use the IP address I use? This is a totally private
network and is not connected to the Internet.

Regards Frengky

--
Sendt med M2 - Operas revolusjonerende e-postprogram:
http://www.opera.com/m2/
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
rave
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      04-09-2005
>From the config snippets you have attached the NAT seems right to em
however if you can paste the entire config I can tell you more.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VPN, from nat without VPN to nat with it Allan Wilson Cisco 1 07-05-2004 10:51 PM
Identity Nat v Exemption NAT Kenny D Cisco 1 05-08-2004 03:11 PM
NAT exemption versus Static NAT. Where is the difference? Anonymous Poster Cisco 0 04-26-2004 04:29 AM
Attn: NAT Experts - 2611XM and NAT pool JCVD Cisco 1 02-13-2004 12:30 PM
NAT or Not to NAT; how to do an Internet connection for a 100-PC company ? Al Dykes Cisco 8 10-29-2003 12:34 AM



Advertisments