Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > Catalyst 2960's. Chain or star?

Reply
Thread Tools

Catalyst 2960's. Chain or star?

 
 
Ingot
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-02-2006
Brief Question, if anyone cares to help...

If I have a stack of 2960's (about 6), each with two GigE uplink ports...

Would it be better to chain the uplink ports together, from one switch to
the next to utilize the GigE bandwidth?

Or would it be better to run them all in a star configuration off of one
central switch to better isolate the traffic, even if that means that the
uplinking lines are at 100mb?

Thanks for any advice you can give!

Ingot


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Doug McIntyre
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-02-2006
"Ingot" <> writes:
>Brief Question, if anyone cares to help...


>If I have a stack of 2960's (about 6), each with two GigE uplink ports...


>Would it be better to chain the uplink ports together, from one switch to
>the next to utilize the GigE bandwidth?


>Or would it be better to run them all in a star configuration off of one
>central switch to better isolate the traffic, even if that means that the
>uplinking lines are at 100mb?


I suppose it helps to know what kind of bandwidth you expect and where?


The star will give you better resiliency against problems, but will be
more of a bottleneck on this type of switch if there's alot of
traffic going from switch to switch.

The chain will give you bigger internal bandwidth, but one bad switch in the
chain can bring down your network beyond it.

Your choice. Either are valid.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ingot
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-03-2006

"Doug McIntyre" <> wrote in message news:454a7f24$0$34561

> The chain will give you bigger internal bandwidth, but one bad switch in

the
> chain can bring down your network beyond it.
>
> Your choice. Either are valid.


Thanks, that's what I needed.

I was a bit concerned with the chaining, since all of our users tend to
access the same set of servers primarily. Until now, I've done a star of
all user switches off of the same switch the servers are on.

I appreciate the advice.

Ingot


 
Reply With Quote
 
Merv
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-04-2006
If you can obtain the budget, you would be best off to dual homew each
switch to two centrl switches that are both interconnected.

This topology address both bandwidth and redundancy issues.

 
Reply With Quote
 
angry_engineer@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-05-2006
Ingot:

If you have the available ports you could do dual or quad channel
etherchannel in a star configuration. That would give you 200-400mpbs
from the spoke to the hub, and it would provide some semblance of
redundancy.

So lets say you use 4 ports. The hub would need 20 ports for this
purpose (5 switches X 4 ports). You could then use the gig ports on
the hub in a similar fashion and have a 2 gigabit uplink to the rest of
the network.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
anyone know about: vlan trunking with catalyst 1900 to any other iosdevice (catalyst 2950) Neddy Cisco 8 05-27-2009 04:37 PM
WTS Cisco Catalyst & Catalyst Express Switches isptrader VOIP 0 12-20-2007 06:06 PM
Creating Subnets, DHCP Relay, Catalyst 6000, PIX, Catalyst 2948/2924 cruz@hnu.edu Cisco 3 02-09-2007 10:12 PM
Catalyst 2960 and Catalyst Express 500 Roberto Giana Cisco 0 09-20-2005 11:30 AM
VLAN trunking across Catalyst 2900 XL and Catalyst 1900. Jarek Jarzebowski Cisco 1 06-18-2005 08:57 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57