«

Ok, thanks! I guess that solution will do!

I thought I'd have to change the syntactic meaning of "use", but
vhdl-mode is kinda complicated (20k lines), so I probably don't want to
mess there anyway

Mike Treseler escreveu:

> Hugo wrote:
> > So, any ideas on how to indent the use's relative to "library ieee" ? I
> > know it's pretty silly thing...
> >
> > The only way I know to accomplish that would be a post-beautifier
> > function that fixes those lines.. but this sounds rather ugly...
>
> Since I hijacked your thread, here's an idea.
>
> Yes. If you look at the source for vhdl-beautify-buffer you will
> see that it is pretty tightly wound. I would write a
> wrapper function called vhdl-align-use that would
> call beautify then find the first USE, insert three spaces, etc.
> Something like:
>
> (defun align-use () "Indent vhdl use clauses"
> (vhdl-beautify-buffer)
> (beginning-of-buffer)
> ;;code to search for "use" lines and insert three spaces goes here.
> )

Mike Treseler wrote:

> I'll do such an emacs function


(defun vhdl-ieee () "Insert ieee use clauses"
(interactive)
(insert "
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use ieee.numeric_std.all;
"))


-- Mike Treseler

Mike Treseler <> writes:

> Mike Treseler wrote:
>
>> I'll do such an emacs function
>
>
> (defun vhdl-ieee () "Insert ieee use clauses"
> (interactive)
> (insert "
> library ieee;
> use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
> use ieee.numeric_std.all;
> "))

And add this:
(define-key vhdl-template-map "\C-pi" 'vhdl-ieee)
to add it to the VHDL-template keymappings, (so you do C-c C-t C-p i
to insert it). Now I need to figure out how to get it onto the
menu...

Cheers,
Martin

--

TRW Conekt - Consultancy in Engineering, Knowledge and Technology
http://www.conekt.net/electronics.html

My apprach is a little different... I have a vhdl file template that is
inserted when I run "Insert header", and it already contains ieee
clauses, entity and architecture pairs, etc.

Cheers,
HS

On 26 jan, 11:17, Martin Thompson <martin.j.thomp...@trw.com> wrote:
> Mike Treseler <mike_trese...@comcast.net> writes:
> > Mike Treseler wrote:
>
> >> I'll do such an emacs function
>
> > (defun vhdl-ieee () "Insert ieee use clauses"
> > (interactive)
> > (insert "
> > library ieee;
> > use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
> > use ieee.numeric_std.all;
> > "))And add this:
> (define-key vhdl-template-map "\C-pi" 'vhdl-ieee)
> to add it to the VHDL-template keymappings, (so you do C-c C-t C-p i
> to insert it). Now I need to figure out how to get it onto the
> menu...
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> --
> martin.j.thomp...@trw.com
> TRW Conekt - Consultancy in Engineering, Knowledge and Technologyhttp://www.conekt.net/electronics.html

HS wrote:
> My approach is a little different... I have a vhdl file template that is
> inserted when I run "Insert header", and it already contains ieee
> clauses, entity and architecture pairs, etc.

>>> Mike Treseler wrote:
>>> (defun vhdl-ieee () "Insert ieee use clauses"
>>> (interactive)
>>> (insert "
>>> library ieee;
>>> use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
>>> use ieee.numeric_std.all;
>>> "))

> On 26 jan, 11:17, Martin Thompson wrote:
>> And add this:
>> (define-key vhdl-template-map "\C-pi" 'vhdl-ieee)
>> to add it to the VHDL-template keymappings, (so you do C-c C-t C-p i
>> to insert it). Now I need to figure out how to get it onto the
>> menu...


Thanks to HS and Martin for the vhdl-mode tips.
Looks like emacs wins round one 3 to nil

-- Mike Treseler

Martin Thompson <> writes:

> Mike Treseler <> writes:
>
>> Mike Treseler wrote:
>>
>>> I'll do such an emacs function
>>
>>
>> (defun vhdl-ieee () "Insert ieee use clauses"
>> (interactive)
>> (insert "
>> library ieee;
>> use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
>> use ieee.numeric_std.all;
>> "))
>
> And add this:
> (define-key vhdl-template-map "\C-pi" 'vhdl-ieee)
> to add it to the VHDL-template keymappings, (so you do C-c C-t C-p i
> to insert it).

Doh! What's actually required is this (after Mike's bit):

(add-hook 'vhdl-mode-hook
(lambda()
(define-key vhdl-template-map "\C-pi" 'vhdl-template-package-ieee)))

I'm sure a proper elisper would have a better way of doing it...

Cheers,
Martin

--

TRW Conekt - Consultancy in Engineering, Knowledge and Technology
http://www.conekt.net/electronics.html