Re: Is it worth doing MCSE 2003 NOW?

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:10:01 -0800, Azhar
<> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I did my MCSE on NT4 way back in year 2000, then recently I passed exam
>070-282 Small Biz Server. I am just considering MCSE 2003 now. Is it worth
>doing NOW? I mean is there anything on its way that will make this mcse 2003
>expired in a year or two? I dnt want to waste plenty of time in preparation
>and nearly £1000 in exam fees and then find out few months later something
>new has come....I hope u all know what I mean....plz guide thanks

I bloody hope so (worth doing, that is).
Just started mine also. Well I have planned to go as far as an MCSA
before deciding where to go from there. Thinking of a security track
but undecided on the best route for this.
Got as far as 070-270 so far, which is a doddle.
Just booked in for the 070-290 which I was hoping to take in 2-weeks
but the earliest appointment I could get was for January 4th.
I just hope the holiday period celebrations (p*ss ups) do not pickle
my brain so much that I forget to even attend.

You are a little out on your estimation of the cost to take the exams.
If you acquire some exam vouchers for 15% (or more) off, the cost for
the seven exams is going to be approx £600, or less (including vat).
If you read some earlier posts you will see that my knowledge of
theoretical math is extremely good (but don't quote me on that).

I say, go for it

--
Thx.
PajaP
(another Engrish chap)

PajaP

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:53:03 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:

> which is a doddle.

Is that good or bad?

--
JaR
MCNGP 22
Two countries seperated by a common language
Remove hat to reply

JaR

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:20:27 -0800, JaR <> wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:53:03 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:
>
>> which is a doddle.
>
>Is that good or bad?

Oops, UK slang.
Doddle = easy task
or piece of p*ss

so good, I guess.

PajaP

On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:27:44 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:

> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:20:27 -0800, JaR <> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:53:03 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:
>>
>>> which is a doddle.
>>
>>Is that good or bad?
>
> Oops, UK slang.
> Doddle = easy task
> or piece of p*ss
>
> so good, I guess.



--
JaR
MCNGP 22
So it's da shizzle?
Remove hat to reply

JaR

PajaP wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:20:27 -0800, JaR <> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:53:03 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:
> >
> >> which is a doddle.
> >
> >Is that good or bad?
>
> Oops, UK slang.
> Doddle = easy task
> or piece of p*ss
>
> so good, I guess.

Then what about Cock-a-Doddle-doooo ?

Cerebrus

On 2 Dec 2006 03:07:36 -0800, "Cerebrus" <> wrote:

>
>PajaP wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:20:27 -0800, JaR <> wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:53:03 +0000, PajaP cast into the ether:
>> >
>> >> which is a doddle.
>> >
>> >Is that good or bad?
>>
>> Oops, UK slang.
>> Doddle = easy task
>> or piece of p*ss
>>
>> so good, I guess.
>
>Then what about Cock-a-Doddle-doooo ?

If you really want to know what a Cock-a-Doddle does then maybe you
should ask him yourself:

http://tinyurl.com/yhcf47

--
P
PajaP

PajaP