In article <cs4942$gso$>,
OZ <_cutit> wrote:
:I have problem with VPN connection. My configuration is:
:client (XP with Cisco VPN CLient 4.0.5)--->:Internet-->router 2621 with 12.3
:Everything with VPN connections looks very good.
:I can succesfully establish new connection, but after that
:I can reach by ping only cisco router.

C gets static default route through the router,
:router adds static route to the PC (RRI - revers route),
:but I can reach only router from PC (from router PC is accessible too).
:crypto isakmp client configuration group vpn
:key cisco
:domain winkowski.pl

ool remote-pool
:crypto map dynmap isakmp authorization list vpn
:crypto map dynmap client configuration address respond
:crypto map dynmap 1 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
:!interface FastEthernet0/0
:description $FW_INSIDE$$ETH-LAN$
:ip address 211.224.126.xxx 255.255.255.192
:crypto map dynmap
:interface FastEthernet0/1
:ip address 192.168.18.254 255.255.255.0
:crypto map dynmap
You probably don't want the same crypto map applied to both
interfaces. You only want to apply the crypto map to FE0/1
if you have -inside- hosts that will be VPN'ing to the router.
:ip local pool remote-pool 192.168.18.50 192.168.18.99
:ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.18.1
Where did that 192.168.5.0 come from? You don't have any
other reference to it.
It appears to me that your problem is that you hand the remote
system an IP address from remote-pool which is the same
IP range as your inside interface. When your inside hosts try
to send to that IP, they are going to expect the IP to be
local, not remote, and so are not going to try sending to
the IP via the router. The only way to get that to work would
be if your inside hosts were paying attention to routing
information such as RIP2 and you configured RIP to 'redistribute
static' in the information it sent out to the inside hosts.
The easiest way to cure the problem is to use a different IP range
for the remote-pool, after which you can probably turn off reverse route.
ip local pool remote-pool 192.168.19.50 192.168.19.99
This IP range is not the inside IP range, so inside hosts will
use the default gateway and send traffic to those IPs to the router.
The router will then find the security association in its
tables and know to send the traffic to the VPN client.
See for example the below example. It is a more complicated case
than what you need, but it's what I found first

Notice
in particular that the IP range assigned to the client is not
that of any of the interfaces of the routers involved.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk58...800ef7ba.shtml
Do not, by the way, just change your pool to 192.168.5/24 without
getting rid of that ip route statement -- you don't want the
traffic outbound to the clients to be redirected to the inside LAN.
--
'ignorandus (Latin): "deserving not to be known"'
-- Journal of Self-Referentialism