![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Al wrote: > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:31:12 +0100, Paul Cupis wrote: > > >Ah, sorry, this is a new requirement of VoIP to me. I thought it was a > >type of VoIP because it allowed you to have voice conversation over > >Internet Protocol. > > This must be a first. I find myself agreeing with Paul Cupis! > > What nonsense this man Ivor is speaking. I'm no fan at all of Skype > but he and his constant tripe saying that unless you have an ATA > you're not using voip. Utter twaddle! > > Quite why everyone wants to continue here, where it's off-topic, > rather than uk.telecom.voip is also beyond me. As Skype apparently 'doesn't count' as VOIP it would be even more off-topic over there. Andy Lord |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Andy Lord" <> wrote in message
news: ups.com > Al wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:31:12 +0100, Paul Cupis wrote: > > > > > Ah, sorry, this is a new requirement of VoIP to me. I > > > thought it was a type of VoIP because it allowed you > > > to have voice conversation over Internet Protocol. > > > > This must be a first. I find myself agreeing with Paul > > Cupis! > > > > What nonsense this man Ivor is speaking. I'm no fan at > > all of Skype but he and his constant tripe saying that > > unless you have an ATA you're not using voip. Utter > > twaddle! I never said that Skype isn't VoIP. I said that it isn't usable without a PC hence it is of no use to anyone wishing to use it seriously with external equipment. > > Quite why everyone wants to continue here, where it's > > off-topic, rather than uk.telecom.voip is also beyond > > me. > > As Skype apparently 'doesn't count' as VOIP it would be > even more off-topic over there. Read what I said again. Ivor |
|