Hi KK,
Leaving sarcasticism aside, here is some rationale behind that
*novel* suggestion.
1. Many vendors support such "relax"/"extended LRM" implementation of
VHDL - guess b'cos of VHDL's rigidness. (No I'm not against any
specific language, just my guess on why these options exist: -relax in
NC, -xlrm in VCSMX etc.)
2. So what goes under "relax" is heavily customer (and vendor)
dependent and hence is expected to change across releases - I don't
work for an EDA vendor, hence can't get more specific than this.
3. Now you would have realized (after reading their manual) that this
-relax indeed has several relaxations - sometimes too many to be posted
here for easy digestion.
4. Lastly, google search for "ncvhdl -relax" did reveal NC's document
on web.
Anyway, I neither intend to sound arrogant, nor apologetic.
Regards
Ajeetha, CVC
www.noveldv.com
kk wrote:
> Thanks for the *novel* suggestion. I posted this only because i didnt
> had the access to NC's documents at that time and i couldn't find that
> in the net too. Anyways i got the answer now.
>
> Ajeetha wrote:
> > Read NC's document on this. I wonder why youy didn't do that before
> > posting!
> >
> > Regards
> > Ajeetha, CVC
> > www.noveldv.com
> > www.systemverilog.us
> >
> > kk wrote:
> > > what does -RELAX option do in ncvhdl. are the designs compiled with and
> > > without the option set incompatible.
> > >
> > > thanks in adv.
