Nick Maclaren wrote:

> |> just a thought: if you *always* work with "floats" with two decimals,

> |> you are in fact working with integers, but you represent them as a

> |> floats - confusing for the internal representation.

>

> No, you aren't - you are working with fixed-point
Nick, your answer has so many layers, I'll try to explain how I think

1) if you use integers you can think of them as having one part bigger

than 100 and one part smaller than 100, like so:

>>> a = 11122

>>> (a/100,a%100)
(111, 22)

Here the output 111,22 looks like something else than an integer, but

this is just a matter of representation. a *is* an integer, but we

represent it *as if it was* a "decimal" number. (Compare with

(minutes,seconds) or (euro,cents) or (feet,inch) or any other

"arbitrary" position system)

2) If we use floats with two decimals

>>> b = 222.33

>>> b
222.33000000000001

they look like fix-point numbers (I had to look it up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed-point ) but python stores it

(correct me if I am wrong) as a float (or double or quad or whatever).

If we want to work with fix-point aritmetics we have to invent new

functions to do most math.

3) Most "decimal numbers" cannot be stored exactly as floats - that is

why b gave the ugly print. But some can, f.x

>>> quart = 0.25

>>> quart
0.25

quart translates to a finite "decimal" number in binary (0.01 I think).

The point is: representing should-be integers as floats makes you loose

precision (negligable probalby but still...).

4)

> |> So why not work with int(float * 100) instead? This way you only have

> |> to take care of roundoffs etc when dividing.

>

> And multiplying, and calling most mathematical functions.
You are correct of course. My mistake.

But, the multiplication is exact before you start rounding off - I wont

start counting ordos for int*int vs. float*float, but it could have

some advantages

>>> a
11122

>>> b
22233

>>> a*b
247275426

>>> (a*b/10000,a*b%10000)
(24727, 5426)

On the other hand you will quickly loose accuracy if you perform

multiple multiplications or divisions or use other mathematical

functions.

5) So, when could this way of thinking be useful? Well, rarely, but if

you only add/subtract "decimals" and/or multiply "decimals" with whole

numbers or if you want to use some non-metric system to do scientific

stuff (compute square feet when having (feet1,inch1) * (feet2,inch2)

assuming that inches are atomic.)

This could of course be extended to

(feet, inch, quarter_of_afoot, sixteeth_of_a_foot) if you'd like - it

is all a matter of representation.

Regards,

Per

----

"It is a gift. A gift to the foes of 'the Terrorists'. Why not

use this 'terrorism'? Long has my father, 'George Bush Sr',

kept the forces of 'the terrorists' at bay. By the blood of

our people are your lands kept safe. Give 'the land of the

brave' the weapon of the enemy. Let us use it against him."