Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Cisco > several crypto maps for one interface, is it possible?

Reply
Thread Tools

several crypto maps for one interface, is it possible?

 
 
B.T.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-19-2004
I have my cisco 800 router configured to allow vpn from Cisco Client VPN
software, so that anyone can connect from a laptop. To allow this I have:

interface ATM0.1 point-to-point

ip address xxxxx

ip nat outside

pvc 8/32

encapsulation aal5snap

!

crypto map clientmap





But now, I want to configure it to configure a VPN with other office, with
other crypto map. How can I do this?, I mean is it right to set two cryto
map for the same interface, in this way:

interface ATM0.1 point-to-point

ip address 213.96.73.215 255.255.255.192

ip nat outside

pvc 8/32

encapsulation aal5snap

!

crypto map clientmap

crypto map lanmap <<<<<-------------------- is it right to have both
crypto maps, clientmap and lanmap for the same interface?



Thanks,



B.T.











 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Walter Roberson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-19-2004
In article <1_bdd.3140125$> ,
B.T. <> wrote:
:I have my cisco 800 router configured to allow vpn from Cisco Client VPN
:software, so that anyone can connect from a laptop. To allow this I have:

: crypto map clientmap

:But now, I want to configure it to configure a VPN with other office, with
ther crypto map. How can I do this?, I mean is it right to set two cryto
:map for the same interface

No, you can only use one crypto map per interface. To be able to
connect to multiple sites, use different crypto map policy numbers
for the two.

crypto map FOO 100 isakmp-ipsec
crypto map FOO 100 match-address ...
crypto map FOO 100 set peer ...
crypto map FOO 150 isakmp-ipsec
crypto map FOO 150 match-address ...
crypto map FOO 150 set peer ...

The policy numbers have no absolute meaning, but the lowest policy
number will be evaluated before the first. This makes a difference
if your access-list's for your match-address's have overlaps,
and makes a difference when you import a crypto dynamic-map into
a crypto map [in that you usually do not have an access-list associated
with dynamic maps, and the implicit access-list in that case is to
match everything as soon as a dynamic peer successfully negotiates.]
--
Caution: A subset of the statements in this message may be
tautologically true.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
virtual tunnel interfaces / crypto maps GT Cisco 2 06-11-2008 08:37 PM
PIX VPN: Selecting dynamic crypto maps based on certificate Pondlife Cisco 0 04-28-2008 08:50 AM
Multiple crypto maps on a 3825 router interface ttripp@magnoliamanor.com Cisco 4 02-10-2007 12:39 PM
tunnels and crypto maps Dan Lanciani Cisco 0 03-20-2006 06:42 AM
multiple crypto maps on cisco pix tical Cisco 2 12-02-2003 05:56 PM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57