Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Python > What license to choose for Python programs? (PSF License vs. GPL/LGPL)

Reply
Thread Tools

What license to choose for Python programs? (PSF License vs. GPL/LGPL)

 
 
Volker Grabsch
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-25-2005
Hi!

I noticed that many packages in the PyPI are using the PSF License.
Does this have a special reason? Is this the common "standard" license
for Python libraries?

I'm just asking because I'll release some bigger pieces of Python code
to the Open Source Community. In my many projects before I just used
GPL or LGPL. This didn't have a special reason. They are just standard
OS licenses. I could also have used the BSD License, but I personally
like the GPL/LGPL more.

Of course I know that there are many, many other licenses out there.
I'm not interested in comparing them all for their slight differences.
I don't choose the license primarily for protecting my code. I want to
choose the license according to the most common/appropriate way of the
community.

So if it is complicated to include an LGPL'ed Python library in the
Python standard libraries, I'd release it under PSF License. I'd like
to hear some opinions about that. What licenses do you use, and what's
your personal reason for doing so?

Also, a quick overview about the various licenses would be nice. Not
a legal comparison, but a list about what type of code/programs/libs
is usually released under which license.


Thanks for your help,

Volker

--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
\frac{\left|\vartheta_0\times\{\ell,\kappa\in\Re\} \right|}{\sqrt
[G]{-\Gamma(\alpha)\cdot\mathcal{B}^{\left[\oint\!c_\hbar\right]}}}
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Str=F6der?=
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-25-2005
Volker Grabsch wrote:
>
> I noticed that many packages in the PyPI are using the PSF License.
> Does this have a special reason?


Personally I used Python style license to express that you can do with
some of my modules exactly what you can do with Python itself.

> So if it is complicated to include an LGPL'ed Python library in the
> Python standard libraries, I'd release it under PSF License.


Unfortunately the Python style license is not suitable to reach that goal.

Recommended reading:

http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSo...tionLicenseFaq

> Also, a quick overview about the various licenses would be nice.


Maybe biased:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

Ciao, Michael.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Michael Hudson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-25-2005
(Volker Grabsch) writes:

> Hi!
>
> I noticed that many packages in the PyPI are using the PSF License.
> Does this have a special reason?


Lots of people are misguided, maybe.

Anyway, you want to be reading this:

http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSo...tionLicenseFaq

Cheers,
mwh

--
Roll on a game of competetive offence-taking.
-- Dan Sheppard, ucam.chat
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Request for a downgrade from x64 OEM license to 32-bit OEM license =?Utf-8?B?SmVyZW15IFdvbmcg6buD5rOT6YeP?= Windows 64bit 58 09-22-2005 11:33 PM
Licensing Python code under the Python license Daniel Keep Python 11 03-14-2005 12:30 PM
Python on WWW - beginners question: what to choose? Almad Python 5 02-07-2005 07:15 PM
Pix 501 VPN License Issue - Not freeing License Jens Haase Cisco 1 01-29-2004 08:29 PM
Help me choose a C++ compiler to work with Python rhmd Python 12 10-01-2003 09:21 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57