Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Programming > Python > RE: What's TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python?

Reply
Thread Tools

RE: What's TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python?

 
 
sismex01@hebmex.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-18-2003
[Erik Max Francis]
>
> There's been at least four of five times where Brandon has claimed to
> have put me in his killfile; he keeps "forgetting." Not that that is
> terribly surprising coming from someone who is so fond of
> telling people about the contents of his killfile.
>


Oohh!! Now you're REALLY gonna get it!

He's gonna REALLY REALLY gonna put you in his killfile!

....maybe!



-gustavo

pd: Next week on National Enquirer: BRANDON'S KILLFILE!!



Advertencia:La informacion contenida en este mensaje es confidencial y
restringida, por lo tanto esta destinada unicamente para el uso de la
persona arriba indicada, se le notifica que esta prohibida la difusion de
este mensaje. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, o si hay problemas en
la transmision, favor de comunicarse con el remitente. Gracias.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Brandon J. Van Every
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2003
http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> [Erik Max Francis]
>>
>> There's been at least four of five times where Brandon has claimed to
>> have put me in his killfile; he keeps "forgetting." Not that that is
>> terribly surprising coming from someone who is so fond of
>> telling people about the contents of his killfile.


Erik, every time you have ever been "responded to," it's been an indirect
quote. You have been in my killfile, and off my radar, for at least a year
if not longer. Sometimes I forget you exist. But every once in awhile I
see your name, quoted, in the groups I participate in. Sometimes I'll
respond to a point you have made, that someone else has followed up to, if
it's a sufficiently interesting point. But you'll notice I never sustain
any debate with you, let alone respond to your muckraking drivel. Notice,
in the present instance, that there is no direct response to your quip about
c.l.r being more useful because I'm not in it. I learned about it
secondhand.

> Oohh!! Now you're REALLY gonna get it!
>
> He's gonna REALLY REALLY gonna put you in his killfile!
>
> ...maybe!
>
>
>
> -gustavo
>
> pd: Next week on National Enquirer: BRANDON'S KILLFILE!!


And if I continue to killfile all your fellow gremlins, I may yet reach a
time when I never even know. Goodbye, gustavo!

--
Cheers, www.3DProgrammer.com
Brandon Van Every Seattle, WA

20% of the world is real.
80% is gobbledygook we make up inside our own heads.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Ben Finney
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2003
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:16:06 -0700, Erik Max Francis wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>> Seeing second-hand comments (as quoted by others) from people in one's
>> killfile is a hazard of Usenet.

>
> Of course. And it's easily avoided with the tiniest bit of
> self-restraint.


Uh, no. Seeing them isn't amenable to self-restraint -- you can only
exercise that *after* seeing them.

--
\ "Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be |
`\ over here, looking through your stuff." -- Jack Handey |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <http://bignose.squidly.org/>
 
Reply With Quote
 
Aahz
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2003
In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Ben Finney <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>Brandon accesses comp.lang.python via Usenet, not email. His
>X-Newsreader header shows he is using Outlook Express. I don't know of
>any newsreaders that can allow you to filter on the person(s) to whom
>the current post is responding -- nor any email clients with the
>facility, for that matter.
>
>The "References" header could theoretically allow you get that
>information, but it would be expensive to do so for every message,
>especially in long-running threads.


Supposedly gnus and slrn do that, though.
--
Aahz ((E-Mail Removed)) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

This is Python. We don't care much about theory, except where it intersects
with useful practice. --Aahz
 
Reply With Quote
 
Erik Max Francis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2003
Ben Finney wrote:

> Seeing second-hand comments (as quoted by others) from people in one's
> killfile is a hazard of Usenet.


Of course. And it's easily avoided with the tiniest bit of
self-restraint.

--
Erik Max Francis && (E-Mail Removed) && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && &tSftDotIotE
/ \ No man is more cheated than the selfish man.
\__/ Henry Ward Beecher
 
Reply With Quote
 
David Eppstein
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-19-2003
In article <bhsbmd$rv5$(E-Mail Removed)>, (E-Mail Removed) (Aahz)
wrote:

> In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
> Ben Finney <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> >
> >Brandon accesses comp.lang.python via Usenet, not email. His
> >X-Newsreader header shows he is using Outlook Express. I don't know of
> >any newsreaders that can allow you to filter on the person(s) to whom
> >the current post is responding -- nor any email clients with the
> >facility, for that matter.
> >
> >The "References" header could theoretically allow you get that
> >information, but it would be expensive to do so for every message,
> >especially in long-running threads.

>
> Supposedly gnus and slrn do that, though.


MT-Newswatcher has no problem with filtering on References:
I use it to make sure I see replies to my own messages,
but I have a distinctive string on the user side of my message-ID's.
Brandon doesn't seem to, but does seem to use a distinctive host:
ID-203719.news.uni-berlin.de.

Googling for that, it seems that the only other stuff you would lose by
killfiling references containing that hostname would be his six-way
crossposts to alt.atheism, alt.politics.bush, alt.fan.noam-chomsky,
soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.jewish, soc.culture.russian, and
soc.history.war.misc... Some people are still saying he isn't a troll?

--
David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nick Vargish
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-20-2003
Ben Finney <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:

> I don't know of any newsreaders that can allow you to filter on the
> person(s) to whom the current post is responding


Gnus certainly can.

Nick

--
# sigmask || 0.2 || 20030107 || public domain || feed this to a python
print reduce(lambda x,y+chr(ord(y)-1),' Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAcboefstobudi/psh?')
 
Reply With Quote
 
smarter_than_you
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-21-2003
The real question here is, why haven't we all but Brandon in OUR killfiles?

Nick Vargish <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> Ben Finney <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:
>
> > I don't know of any newsreaders that can allow you to filter on the
> > person(s) to whom the current post is responding

>
> Gnus certainly can.
>
> Nick

 
Reply With Quote
 
Nick Vargish
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-21-2003
(E-Mail Removed) (smarter_than_you) writes:

> The real question here is, why haven't we all but Brandon in OUR killfiles?


When there's a stinging insect flying around the room, I like to be
able to see it.

Also, his perspective is so different from mine, I find it useful to
be reminded that there are people like him out there. It's fascinating
the way he seems to think everything needs to be a zero-sum
interaction... I mean, _why_ does anyone in the open source world have
to eat anyone else's lunch? Why is market dominance supposed to be
important to pythonistas? It's just good to be reminded that some
people really think like this -- as weird as it might seem to me.

Nick

--
# sigmask || 0.2 || 20030107 || public domain || feed this to a python
print reduce(lambda x,y+chr(ord(y)-1),' Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAcboefstobudi/psh?')
 
Reply With Quote
 
David M. Cook
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      08-21-2003
In article <(E-Mail Removed) >,
smarter_than_you wrote:

> The real question here is, why haven't we all but Brandon in OUR killfiles?


Brandon's not very interesting (or only as interesting as the spectacle of
someone behaving badly usually is), but some of the replies are.

Dave Cook
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOIP over VPN over TCP over WAP over 3G Theo Markettos UK VOIP 2 02-14-2008 03:27 PM
in search of a compelling reason to use ruby.... Ryan Paul Ruby 22 05-13-2004 11:18 AM
in search of a compelling reason to use ruby.... Neil Mc Laughlin Ruby 0 05-10-2004 03:37 PM
What's TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python? Brandon J. Van Every Python 51 08-23-2003 02:47 AM
Re: What's TOTALLY COMPELLING about Ruby over Python? Michael Sparks Python 2 08-18-2003 10:49 PM



Advertisments