«

No Spam wrote:
> test

failed

success


Tom St Denis wrote:
> No Spam wrote:
>
>> test
>
>
> failed
>

No Spam wrote:

> success
failure.

>
>
> Tom St Denis wrote:
>
>> No Spam wrote:
>>
>>> test
>>
>>
>>
>> failed
>>
>


--
--
LTC: http://libtomcrypt.org
LTM: http://math.libtomcrypt.org
The Book: http://book.libtomcrypt.org

No Spam wrote:

> We could go on like this all day (but I won't).
> I was just testing my news client.

Which news client? And I guess it works, prove positive we can work
together!

> Sorry for the meaningless posts...

You mean there is another kind?

Whoa...

I'm flabberghasted..... [is there a correct way to spell that?]

Tom

No Spam wrote:

> We could go on like this all day (but I won't).
> I was just testing my news client.

Then use a <spoo>ing test newsgroup and stop dumping junk
in a real one.

> Sorry for the meaningless posts...

It is better to avoid meaningless posting than to apologise
for it.

--
Chris "one more and you're in" Dollin
C FAQs at: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/by-newsgrou...mp.lang.c.html
C welcome: http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambl...me_to_clc.html

No Spam <> wrote (26 Jun 2003) in
news: / comp.lang.c:

> We could go on like this all day (but I won't).
> I was just testing my news client.
> Sorry for the meaningless posts...

Even better, you could
a) use a newsgroup designed for this (alt.test)
b) learn not to top-post

Your anti-social use of comp.lang.c instead of alt.test, and your
failure to follow normal practice in posting follow-ups may have already
landed you in some killfiles. Your failure to provide a valid email address
forces any response to take place in public, in a newsgroup where this
whole mess is unwelcome.

--
Martin Ambuhl
Returning soon to the
Fourth Largest City in America