Velocity Reviews > Re: DVD

# Re: DVD

Ely Mendelson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 02-04-2005
Rob Hughes, <(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:

> Prigdash the clown-panicker is alleged to have said in
> comp.os.linux.advocacy:
>
>> Rob Hughes, <(E-Mail Removed)>, wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If there was a ghawd

>>
>> Prove that there isn't.
>>

>
> I'll prove that negative right after you prove there is.

Are you one of those completely illogical ****tards who are so absolutely
stupid that you believe it is not possible to prove a negative? Hmmm? You
are, aren't you snot****?

Try your ****wittery on these, cuntard:

I do not have three legs.
My youngest child does not have a younger brother or sister.
My oldest child does not have an older brother or sister.
The moon does not have a moon.
The moon is not made of green cheese.
Corgis are not cats.

No doubt you'll apply your brilliant logic skills to destroying the proof
below, too, eh?

> But FYI,
> there isn't.

Wow. You got a double whammy in the stupidity stakes. Linux makes you
****ing stupid. Atheism makes you ****ing stupid.

> Just trying to save you the trouble...

Don't forget, "ghawd" = omnipotent metaphysical X.

Definition 1: X is ghawd-like iff X has as essential propertie*s those and
only those properties which are positive.

Definition 2: A is an essence of X iff for every property B,* X has B
necessarily iff A entails B.

Definition 3: X necessarily exists iff every essence of X is* necessarily
exemplified.

Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not* positive.

Axiom 2: Any property entailed by, i.e., strictly implied *by, a positive
property is positive.

Axiom 3: The property of being ghawd-like is positive.

Axiom 4: If a property is positive, then it is necessarily p*ositive.

Axiom 5: Necessary existence is positive.

Axiom 6: For any property P, if P is positive, then being ne*cessarily P is
positive.

Theorem 1: If a property is positive, then it is consistent,* i.e.,
possibly exemplified.

Corollary 1: The property of being ghawd-like is consistent.

Theorem 2: If something is ghawd-like, then the property of be*ing
ghawd-like is an essence of that thing.

Theorem 3: Necessarily, the property of being ghawd-like is ex*emplified.

Your turn. Alternatively you can do a "Governor Swill" and declare a
definition or something to be false therefore it's all false without
actually doing anything other than declaring falsehood.

 Thread Tools

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Nozza Computer Support 5 12-02-2004 10:06 PM Bun Mui Computer Support 0 06-18-2004 11:29 AM Hunter Computer Support 3 08-30-2003 06:06 AM Hunter DVD Video 3 08-30-2003 06:06 AM

Advertisments