«

Shut up you idiot!

LJ

Unknown, this is the last time I'm going to reply to an idiot like you.

Take some "Good Advice" go out put a bag over your head and hope to get laid
for once in your sad little life.

LJ

"Lloyd Jones" <@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cbkqrq$g1k$...
> Shut up you idiot!
>
> LJ
>
>

Such a SHINING WIT (apologies for the Spoonerism). Why not Friar Tuck (again
apologies for the Spoonerism) and get over yourself, twit?

"Lloyd Jones" <@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cbkqva$g55$...
> Unknown, this is the last time I'm going to reply to an idiot like you.
>

Considering you are the fool who keeps constantly proving you dont have a
clue, not only is that good news you wont reply to me again but it is good
news you call me an idiot. Coming from a total moron like you it adds up to
a compliment. Eg, 2 negatives make a positive!

> Take some "Good Advice" go out put a bag over your head and hope to get
laid
> for once in your sad little life.
>

Try this - load your brain before shooting off your mouth, you "wannabe know
nothing".

"Unknown" <> wrote in message
news:d7mDc.580$...
>
> "Thor" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> >
> > "Unknown" <> wrote in message
> > news:05WCc.375$...
> > >
> > > "Lloyd Jones" <> wrote in message
> > > news:cbfnq5$64k$...
> > > > The link I posted will get rid of that virus or it can sometimes be
a
> > > worm,
> > > > but it will get rid 100%.
> > > >
> > > > LJ
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > The link you posted is to Symantec tools which are useless. 1 program
> per
> > > infection run once at a time OR you can get Stinger, as I said and do
41
> > of
> > > them and variants all at once in one pass. What makes more sense?
> Running
> > > multiple Symantec tools one at a time to get rid of more than one
> > infection
> > > or just one program once?
> >
> > If you know what the infection is and are certain that it is the only
>
> That is just plain bad advice. If you have gotten ONE infection, chances
are
> you have MORE than one.

exactly the point you seem to be missing. Stinger is no better in that
regard since it only looks for a fraction of the possible viruses out there.

>
> > infection, then the symantec tools are fine. If you know what *multiple*
>
> Nope, they are a waste of time. Stinger does 41 in one pass. Symantec crud
> does one infection per program and only allowed to run one program at a
> time. Complete waste of time.

Gee, it detects and removes 41 out of the 100,000+ possible viruses out
there. Yeah, that's reassuring. You miss the point entirely. You DON'T use
stinger or the Symantec tools for *detection*. Only for *removal* of *known*
infections. You need to run a full virus scan with a full-coverage scanner
to establish what infections are present, not a small-scale removal tool
like Stinger. If the full scan indicates a single infection that stinger or
the symantec tools handle, then either are fine for removal purposes, if the
full coverage scanner cannot remove them (which is unlikely anyway). If you
have multiple infections and you know stinger handles more than one of the
infections you have, then of course it is more efficient to use Stinger
rather than Symantec's tools. If, however, you only have a single infection
(as established by a full-coverage scanner) then it is no better or worse to
use Symantec's tools versus Stinger. The point is that you do a scan with a
full-coverage scanner first, and if it can't remove the infection for some
reason, then you try something else, but what is sensible to use, depends on
what infection, or infections you have. Symantec's tools are far from
useless. Also consider that there are far more viruses covered by Symantec's
roster of removal tools than Stinger handles in it's list of 41. It is very
possible to have multiple infections where some are covered by Stinger and
others aren't, in which case a combination of stinger and symantec's tools
may be effective, which again rebutts your assertion that symantec's tools
are somehow a "waste of time". Stinger is no panacea, and it's not a good
detection tool. That's the first thing you need to get through your head.
Whether it is "better" as a removal tool depends entirely on what infections
you have.

>Such a SHINING WIT (apologies for the Spoonerism). Why not Friar Tuck
(again
>apologies for the Spoonerism) and get over yourself, twit?

Don't talk to me.

LJ

>Try this - load your brain before shooting off your mouth, you "wannabe
know
>nothing".

I'm guessing you don't have any friends in the real world.

LJ

"Lloyd Jones" <@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cbmbpc$khd$...
> >Such a SHINING WIT (apologies for the Spoonerism). Why not Friar Tuck
> (again
> >apologies for the Spoonerism) and get over yourself, twit?
>
> Don't talk to me.
>

I didn't. I typed to you. Dickhead.

"Thor" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "Unknown" <> wrote in message
> news:d7mDc.580$...
> >
> > "Thor" <> wrote in message
> > news:...
> > >
> > > "Unknown" <> wrote in message
> > > news:05WCc.375$...
> > > >
> > > > "Lloyd Jones" <> wrote in message
> > > > news:cbfnq5$64k$...
> > > > > The link I posted will get rid of that virus or it can sometimes
be
> a
> > > > worm,
> > > > > but it will get rid 100%.
> > > > >
> > > > > LJ
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The link you posted is to Symantec tools which are useless. 1
program
> > per
> > > > infection run once at a time OR you can get Stinger, as I said and
do
> 41
> > > of
> > > > them and variants all at once in one pass. What makes more sense?
> > Running
> > > > multiple Symantec tools one at a time to get rid of more than one
> > > infection
> > > > or just one program once?
> > >
> > > If you know what the infection is and are certain that it is the only
> >
> > That is just plain bad advice. If you have gotten ONE infection, chances
> are
> > you have MORE than one.
>
> exactly the point you seem to be missing. Stinger is no better in that
> regard since it only looks for a fraction of the possible viruses out
there.
>

The point you obviously are missing I have said more than once. Symantec
tools do one possible infection at a time and run one program at a time.
Stinger does 41 in one pass. So, you have a choice. Run one program once to
cover 41 possibilities or run 41, sequentially and not concurrently,
Symantec tools. If you are going to say Stinger is no better, please tell me
how ONE Symantec removal tool, that does only one possibility, is better
than one tool that looks for 41? Stinger is obviously a LOT better but
again, obviously, it isnt meant to be an entire AV program. The MAJOR thing
that Stinger has over Symantec tools apart from what I said is that it will
continue on down deep nested pathways to check dirs. Symantec tools wont go
the same distance. They DO go down deep nested dirs and fail after a certain
length as does Nortons AV. This was reported to them over a year ago and it
still is to be fixed. The result being that if you get infected with a
Trojan that opens a back door and it is deep nested beyond Nortons'
capabilities, Nortons will continue to report your machine virus free when
it isnt.

> >
> > > infection, then the symantec tools are fine. If you know what
*multiple*
> >
> > Nope, they are a waste of time. Stinger does 41 in one pass. Symantec
crud
> > does one infection per program and only allowed to run one program at a
> > time. Complete waste of time.
>
> Gee, it detects and removes 41 out of the 100,000+ possible viruses out

.....and gee, Symantec tools repot ONE out of the approximate 95000! 41 or 1?
Which number is higher to you? You are getting off the topic!

> there. Yeah, that's reassuring. You miss the point entirely. You DON'T use

Nope. You miss it entirely. It was never about the fact that Stinger doesnt
know all viruses/whatevers. No Symantec tool does either so by you saying
that, you are going in a direction that wasnt even mentioned. The topic here
was "which is better? One that removes up to 41 and variants in one pass or
having to run 41 different progs, one at a time and wait till they are
finished?".

> stinger or the Symantec tools for *detection*. Only for *removal* of
*known*

Oh blow me down with a feather! NO virus or torjan/whatever can be REMOVED
without being DETECTED! Sheesh! Dont you know THAT!?

> infections. You need to run a full virus scan with a full-coverage scanner

That had nothing to do with the point I raised. If you cant stick to the
point, why are you arguing? I never SAID Stinger was for everything!

"Lloyd Jones" <@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cbmbrq$qmb$...
> >Try this - load your brain before shooting off your mouth, you "wannabe
> know
> >nothing".
>
> I'm guessing you don't have any friends in the real world.
>

I'm guessing you want to be a "computer guy" one day, when you have learned
enough, if that is even possible for you.