Velocity Reviews - Computer Hardware Reviews

Velocity Reviews > Newsgroups > Computing > Computer Information > Propagation Times

Reply
Thread Tools

Propagation Times

 
 
Tim Harden
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-22-2003
I just swung over my web site to a new web hosting service, Time Warner.
And I've changed the name servers to reflect this yesterday afternoon
through GoDaddy.Com. Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
is done?

Thanks,

Tim...


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Steve Wertz
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-22-2003
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:30:11 GMT, "Tim Harden"
<> wrote:

>I just swung over my web site to a new web hosting service, Time Warner.
>And I've changed the name servers to reflect this yesterday afternoon
>through GoDaddy.Com. Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
>is done?


Usually 24-48 hours.

-sw
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
BinaryBillTheSailor@Sea++.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-22-2003
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:30:11 GMT, "Tim Harden" <>
wrote:

>I just swung over my web site to a new web hosting service, Time Warner.
>And I've changed the name servers to reflect this yesterday afternoon
>through GoDaddy.Com. Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
>is done?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Tim...
>


Somewhere between 6 and 48 hours has been my experience. Usually around the
middle of that range.

BB
 
Reply With Quote
 
Plato
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2003
Tim Harden wrote:
>
> I just swung over my web site to a new web hosting service, Time Warner.
> And I've changed the name servers to reflect this yesterday afternoon
> through GoDaddy.Com. Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
> is done?


Max 3 days and it should be finished.

--
http://www.bootdisk.com/
 
Reply With Quote
 
DeMoN LaG
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2003
"Tim Harden" <> wrote in newsFClb.18762
$:

> Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
> is done?
>


It isn't a set number. Most servers will expire a record between 6 hours
and a week after they cache it. Very few servers will hold it for a week,
but I have seen it. Most will expire it between 12 and 36 hours.

--
AIM: FrznFoodClerk (actually me)
email: de_on-lag@co_cast.net (_ = m)
website: under construction
Need a technician in the south Jersey area?
email/IM for rates/services
 
Reply With Quote
 
Aaron J. Millis
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      10-23-2003
In austin.internet Tim Harden <> wrote:
> I just swung over my web site to a new web hosting service, Time Warner.
> And I've changed the name servers to reflect this yesterday afternoon
> through GoDaddy.Com. Does anyone have an idea when the propagation change
> is done?


There isn't a set time. It is dependant on your dns records' TTL's.
If you have your TTL's set to 86400 seconds, it'll slowly uncache out of
a properly configured name server 24 hours after it initially cached it.
Until then, that name server will keep the old name until that time is up.
If you planned the move ahead of time with your provider, they may have
lowered your TTL in anticipation of the move (though some servers won't
honor extremely low TTL's and cache for a min time anyways).
And to make it even more confusing there are poorly configure name
servers out there that cache beyond your set TTL's.

So, the answer is, it takes as long as you had it set to possibly take.

If you actually moved name servers as well, you probably need to contact
whoever was hosting your old name service to make sure their servers are no
longer answering authoritatively for your domain (or anyone who happens
to be using that name server for lookups will never get the new information).

I just glanced from a roadrunner connection and from IO and they are handing
out different IP's for texaschainsawmassacre.net so it looks like the TTL's
were not turned down. A dig on a server holding the old info show's the names
cached out with 81709 seconds to go (ie, about 1-2am Friday morning it'll expire).

Also interesting, you have the following three name servers that come up for your
domain:
NS1.BIZ.RR.COM
NS2.BIZ.RR.COM
DNS4.RR.COM

The dns4 system does not give an answer for 'texaschainsawmassacre.net' on first
request. It gives a non-authoritative answer for
'www.texaschainsawmassacre.net' pointing to 66.55.33.114. On the second query
of texaschainsawmassacre.net it gave the 198.66.195.9
IP (which I think is the right one?).

ns2.biz had this to say:
> www.texaschainsawmassacre.net

Server: ns2.biz.rr.com
Address: 24.30.201.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www.texaschainsawmassacre.net
Address: 198.66.195.9
> texaschainsawmassacre.net

Server: ns2.biz.rr.com
Address: 24.30.201.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find texaschainsawmassacre.net: No answer


An ns1.biz.rr.com said this:
> server ns1.biz.rr.com

Default server: ns1.biz.rr.com
Address: 24.30.200.19#53
> texaschainsawmassacre.net

Server: ns1.biz.rr.com
Address: 24.30.200.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find texaschainsawmassacre.net: No answer
> www.texaschainsawmassacre.net

Server: ns1.biz.rr.com
Address: 24.30.200.19#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www.texaschainsawmassacre.net
Address: 66.55.33.114
>



That doesn't look good to me. Your primary, secondary, and tertiary
name servers aren't answering authoritatively, they also aren't
giving out the same address and even though they seem to give out
some address from www.domain, they don't seem to necessarily have an
A record for just the domain name.

I don't know what tricks roadrunner does for their business dns
services, but it was my understanding that if your dns was setup
on those servers, they should be answering authoritatively, every
time, regardless of whether or not everyone else's TTL's have expired. . .


-Aaron
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VHDL propagation time Binary VHDL 4 12-13-2005 07:47 AM
JavaDoc propagation Roedy Green Java 0 07-04-2005 01:59 AM
How to prevent propagation of a static default route in EIGRP jimbo Cisco 8 06-28-2005 06:19 PM
Propagation delay trought a control signal "SEL" of a MUX Oleg VHDL 1 02-18-2004 07:45 PM
automatic default route propagation into RIP: default metric Ben Low Cisco 2 12-28-2003 03:57 AM



Advertisments
 



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57