Calvin Crumrine wrote:
> M/S probably means Master/Slave.
JC Allison:
Alright.
CC:
> All & Chained seem redundant. Since M/S
> doesn't apply to SCSI you only have 2 drives that could be in a M/S
> relationship.
JCA:
That is the two WesternDigital IDE HDDs
CC:
> If you have a M/S relationship therefore, by definition,
> *all* your drives (that could be) are in that relationship. (D could be
> asking you to check-if both drives are set M, or both set S, or one set
> as M or S & the other set as Cable Select (CS) then that could be
> causing your problem.
JCA:
As you may have or have not read that the problem with the computer not
detecting the IDE drives was a fault of a switch, and that has been removed
from the system. The IE drives are going to be integrally mounted and
conncted. They are both in Single Drive/Master in the jumper department. The
Primary Master has the CD ROM as Primary Slave. And the other WD IDE HDD is
the Secondary Master.
CC:
> They should either both be set as CS or both be
> set as M & be on separate cables/controllers, or one should be set as M
> & the other as S if they're on the same cable/controller, i.e. chained.)
JCA:
They are on separate controllers.
CC:
> This probably isn't clear because we're talking about what's possible.
> What you need to do is specify how you have them set up. Are they on the
> same cable/controller? How are they jumpered?
JCA:
I'm understanding you perfectly. To reiterate... both jumpered for Single
Drive/Master, each on a separate controller, with the Primary Master having
the CD ROM as the Primary Slave.
I have to move the two Seagate SCSI HDDs each down one level in the HDD
bays, and install the two WD IDE HDDs in the upper bays. I also have to move
the CD ROM drive down to the bottom bay of the upper front access bays.
Anyway, all of this will go quickly just as soon as I'm positive about what
I'm doing, so I don't mess something up in the process... I can do this...
Isn't this fun?
>